Loading…
Gertrude Stein's Passivity: War and the Limits of Modern Subjectivity
Well into the three-month-long Gertrude Stein exhibit in 2012 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso, and the Parisian Avant-Garde, legal scholar Alan Dershowitz published the following: By offering a false explanation of how Stein and Toklas remarkably survived the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Texas studies in literature and language 2016-06, Vol.58 (2), p.129-143 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Well into the three-month-long Gertrude Stein exhibit in 2012 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso, and the Parisian Avant-Garde, legal scholar Alan Dershowitz published the following: By offering a false explanation of how Stein and Toklas remarkably survived the Holocaust, while living in a town from which dozens of Jewish children were deported to death camps, the Met has distorted the history of the Holocaust and failed to point a finger of blame at collaborators, such as Stein, who made it possible. But neither tack seems altogether satisfactory. Stein's pronouncements on war remain troubling. And unlike some of her contemporaries, even those with well-known political lives -- Samuel Beckett, for example, who similarly experienced the war in France up close, yet who chose to keep his aesthetic and political lives apart -- Stein's reflections on the wars she has seen are all over her writing and cannot so easily be bracketed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0040-4691 1534-7303 |
DOI: | 10.7560/TSLL58201 |