A nonstationary bias‐correction technique to remove bias in GCM simulations

We developed an updated nonstationary bias‐correction method for a monthly global climate model of temperature and precipitation. The proposed method combines two widely used quantile mapping bias‐correction methods to eliminate potential illogical values of the variable. Instead of empirical parame...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2016-05, Vol.121 (10), p.5718-5735
Main Authors: Miao, Chiyuan, Su, Lu, Sun, Qiaohong, Duan, Qingyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Air temperature
Bias
bias‐correction
Climate
Climate models
Computer simulation
Distribution
GCM
Geophysics
Global climate
Mapping
Methods
nonstationary
Parameter estimation
Precipitation
Probability distribution
Probability theory
Procedures
quantile mapping
Simulation
Studies
Surface temperature
Temperature
Temperature effects
Uncertainty
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We developed an updated nonstationary bias‐correction method for a monthly global climate model of temperature and precipitation. The proposed method combines two widely used quantile mapping bias‐correction methods to eliminate potential illogical values of the variable. Instead of empirical parameter estimation in the more‐common quantile mapping method, our study compared bias‐correction performance when parametric or nonparametric procedures were used to estimate the probability distribution. The results showed our proposed bias‐correction method to be very effective in reducing the model bias: it removed over 80% and 83% of model bias for surface air temperature and precipitation, respectively, during the validation period. Compared with a widely used method of bias correction (delta change), our proposed technique demonstrates improved correction of the distribution of variables. In addition, nonparametric estimation procedures further reduced the mean absolute errors in temperature and precipitation during the validation period by approximately 2% and 0.4%, respectively, compared with parametric procedures. The proposed method can remove over 40% and 60% of the uncertainty from model temperature and precipitation projections, respectively, at the global land scale. Key Points The proposed bias‐correction method removed over 80% and 83% of model bias for temperature and precipitation, respectively The nonparametric estimation procedures further reduced the MAE in GCM simulation compared with parametric procedures The proposed method can remove over 40% and 60% of the uncertainty from model temperature and precipitation projections, respectively
ISSN:2169-897X
2169-8996
DOI:10.1002/2015JD024159