0464 How do gender and jurisdiction interact with work disability duration?

ObjectivesWe examine whether gender differences in work disability duration were consistent across Canadian provinces and by length of work disability duration.MethodsCohorts of injured workers in British Columbia (BC), Manitoba (MB) and Ontario (ON) were analysed using claim-level data for injuries...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2017-08, Vol.74 (Suppl 1), p.A147
Main Authors: Macpherson, Robert, Koehoorn, Mieke, Quirke, William, Fan, Jonathan, Amick, Benjamin, Mustard, Cameron, Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah, Kraut, Allen, McLeod, Christopher
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Confidence intervals
Data processing
Disability insurance
Gender
Gender aspects
Gender differences
Injuries
Injury analysis
Injury prevention
Jurisdiction
Men
Sex differences
Women
Workers
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectivesWe examine whether gender differences in work disability duration were consistent across Canadian provinces and by length of work disability duration.MethodsCohorts of injured workers in British Columbia (BC), Manitoba (MB) and Ontario (ON) were analysed using claim-level data for injuries occurring between 2007 and 2011. Work disability duration was measured using cumulative days that claims received work disability benefits during one-year post-injury. Extended Cox models provided hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to examine differences between women compared to men transitioning off work disability benefits and how this varied by length of work disability duration in each jurisdiction, adjusting for confounders.ResultsIn all three provinces, women transitioned off disability benefits slower initially (at 1 day, BC: HR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.89–0.91], MB: HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.87–0.91], and ON: HR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.95–0.97]) but in longer claims women transitioned off disability benefits faster (at 9 months, BC: HR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.07–1.13]; MB: HR 1.14 [95% CI 1.08–1.21], and ON: HR: 1.03 [95% CI: 1.01–1.06]. This finding was consistent across different models by province and injury type.ConclusionsThe persistent differences in work disability duration suggest that there may be underlying gender or sex differences in terms of recovery from work-related injury. Policies for the prevention and management of work injuries should be tailored to men’s and women’s specific needs and barriers. The timing of such interventions should be considered given the time-varying differences observed between men and women.
ISSN:1351-0711
1470-7926
DOI:10.1136/oemed-2017-104636.385