Loading…
Towards queering the globally intimate
Analyzing intimacy is in vogue across an array of disciplines. Geographers too have taken up intimacy, engaging it from a variety of perspectives and, as elsewhere, without agreeing on definitional properties. Conventionally understood as a site, space or scale, intimacy figures in (asymmetric) bina...
Saved in:
Published in: | Political geography 2017-01, Vol.56, p.114-116 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Analyzing intimacy is in vogue across an array of disciplines. Geographers too have taken up intimacy, engaging it from a variety of perspectives and, as elsewhere, without agreeing on definitional properties. Conventionally understood as a site, space or scale, intimacy figures in (asymmetric) binaries of global-local, national-familial and public-private. In contrast, Pratt and Rosner paired ‘the global and the intimate’ in a double issue of Women's Studies Quarterly and asked contributors to ‘disrupt traditional organizations of space, to forge productive dislocations, and to reconfigure conventions of scale’ (2006, p. 16). Their essays and related work expanded the range of inquiry and spurred further discussion of the global-intimate relationship, while other scholars explored intimacy through studies of emotion, sexuality, subjectification and the everyday (Harker & Martin, 2012; Oswin & Olund, 2010; Valentine, 2008). Most recently, Pain and Staeheli's (2014; also Pain 2014, 2015) articulation of ‘intimacy-geopolitics’ aims to dissolve the binary and its presumptive hierarchy of global-local. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0962-6298 1873-5096 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.01.001 |