Loading…

Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?

The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 2017-09, Vol.57 (5), p.512-518
Main Authors: Nikolaeva, N. S., Yermolaev, Yu. I., Lodkina, I. G., Yermolaev, M. Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and Dst and Dst * indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further.
ISSN:0016-7932
1555-645X
0016-7940
DOI:10.1134/S0016793217050152