"All the rest is normal". A pilot study on the communication between physician and patient in prenatal diagnosis

• Published in: Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology 2006-09, Vol.27 (3), p.127-130
• Main Authors: Zecca, G., Gradi, E. C., Nilsson, K., Bellotti, M., Verme, S. Dal, Vegni, E., Moja, E. A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amniocentesis - psychology; Biological and medical sciences; Communication; disease severity; Doctor-patient relation; Emotions - physiology; Female; Fetal Diseases - diagnosis; Fetal Diseases - psychology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gynecology and obstetrics; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Italy; Management. Prenatal diagnosis; Medical sciences; Observer Variation; Physician-Patient Relations; Pilot Projects; Pregnancy; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta; prenatal diagnosis; Prenatal Diagnosis - psychology; Psychology and medicine; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; RIAS; Severity of Illness Index; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - psychology; videotape recording; Videotape Recording - methods
• ISSN: 0167-482X; 1743-8942
• DOI: 10.1080/02688690500305753

The aim of the study was to verify in the context of prenatal diagnosis if the communicative style in consultations is modified in relation to the seriousness of the diagnosis. Videoed consultations after executing amniocentesis and ultra-sound scanning of II level were included in the study with the consent of participants. Only visits with Italian speaking couples without psychiatric problems were analyzed for the study. Selected visits were grouped into "low" (L, minor anomalies) and "high" (H, serious anomalies) visits. A modified version of the RIAS tailored for the specific context was used in the analysis. 27 visits, respectively 13 H and 14 L, were studied. Analysis of the communicative structure of the consultations did not show significant differences between the two groups. The communication during the consultation seems to be mostly influenced by a highly disease-centered model that is not dependent on the content of the consultation itself. Only emotional exchanges showed a marginally significant decrease in the H visits (t = 1.995, p = 0.057), suggesting the probable difficulty of the disease-centered model to manage emotional items during a highly dramatic consultation. Due to the exploratory nature of the study, further research is needed to test the preliminary results.