Using the group-value model to explain the role of noninstrumental justice in distinguishing the effects of distributive and procedural justice

The purpose of this study was to distinguish the effects of distributive, instrumental procedural, and noninstrumental (i.e. group-value effects) procedural justice in a field study. As predicted by the group-value model (Lind & Tyler, 1988), noninstrumental procedural justice captured unique va...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of occupational and organizational psychology 2000-12, Vol.73 (4), p.511-518
Main Authors: ROBBINS, Tina L, SUMMERS, Timothy P, MILLER, Janis L, HENDRIX, William H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Compliance
Corporate culture
Distributive justice
Employee attitude
Employees
Fieldwork
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Group performance
Group theory
Group value model
Groups
Hypotheses
Justice
Motivation. Job satisfaction. Attitude
Occupational psychology
Organization theory
Organizational behaviour
Organizational commitment
Organizational effectiveness
Organizational structure
Perceptions
Performance appraisal
Procedural justice
Psychological research
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Raises
Social justice
Social psychology
Studies
Textile industry
Turnover
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!