Psychometric Properties of the Parental Bonding Instrument: Data from a Chinese Adolescent Sample in Hong Kong

Although researchers widely use the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) to measure parenting behaviour in terms of parental care and overprotection, its development using Western samples has cast doubt on its applicability among non-Western ones. In response, we examined psychometric properties of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of child and family studies 2018-07, Vol.27 (7), p.2112-2124
Main Authors: Ngai, Steven Sek-yum, Cheung, Chau-kiu, Xie, Lili, Ng, Yuen-hang, Ngai, Hiu-lam, Liu, Ying, Ho, Jessica Cheuk-min
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescents
Autonomy
Behavior
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Bravery
Caregiving
Child and School Psychology
Child Rearing
Chinese languages
Factor Structure
Honesty
Kindness
Original Paper
Overprotection
Parent-child relations
Parents
Parents & parenting
Perseveration
Personality
Psychology
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Reliability
Self regulation
Social intelligence
Social Sciences
Sociology
Teenage parents
Teenagers
Validity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although researchers widely use the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) to measure parenting behaviour in terms of parental care and overprotection, its development using Western samples has cast doubt on its applicability among non-Western ones. In response, we examined psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PBI by using survey data collected from a sample of 1997 Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong, whose mean age was 14.6 years and 50.3% of whom were girls. Our results supported a 4-factor structure representing caring, indifferent, overprotective, and autonomous parenting behaviours that we confirmed to be applicable to paternal and maternal parenting behaviours. Results of Cronbach’s alpha tests indicated that the measure is of good reliability, and correlations between the PBI and character strengths confirmed the scale’s good concurrent validity. Parental care and autonomy positively correlated with bravery, honesty, perseverance, kindness, love, self-regulation, social intelligence, and fairness, whereas indifference and overprotection negatively correlated with those eight character strengths. Parenting differences emerged regarding parental and children’s gender. In all, the Chinese version of the PBI proved to be a psychometrically robust measure for capturing adolescents’ perceptions of parenting behaviours in Hong Kong, which we discuss in terms of implications for future research.
ISSN:1062-1024
1573-2843
DOI:10.1007/s10826-018-1058-8