A note on the eternal dominating set problem

• Published in: International journal of game theory 2018-05, Vol.47 (2), p.543-555
• Main Authors: Finbow, Stephen, Gaspers, Serge, Messinger, Margaret-Ellen, Ottaway, Paul
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Behavioral/Experimental Economics; Cameras; Combinatorial analysis; Dominance; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods; Economics; Economics and Finance; Game Theory; Games; Guards; Operations Research/Decision Theory; Original Paper; Social and Behav. Sciences
• ISSN: 0020-7276; 1432-1270
• DOI: 10.1007/s00182-018-0623-0

We consider the “all guards move” model for the eternal dominating set problem. A set of guards form a dominating set on a graph and at the beginning of each round, a vertex not in the dominating set is attacked. To defend against the attack, the guards move (each guard either passes or moves to a neighboring vertex) to form a dominating set that includes the attacked vertex. The minimum number of guards required to defend against any sequence of attacks is the “eternal domination number” of the graph. In 2005, it was conjectured [Goddard et al. (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 52:169–180, 2005)] there would be no advantage to allow multiple guards to occupy the same vertex during a round. We show this is, in fact, false. We also describe algorithms to determine the eternal domination number for both models for eternal domination and examine the related combinatorial game, which makes use of the reduced canonical form of games.