Loading…

Safety of bevacizumab treatment in combination with standard chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective review of 65 Japanese patients

Background Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when combined with standard chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, because this drug was approved in Japan only in 2007, there has been little experience in Japan. This study was conducted to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of clinical oncology 2009-12, Vol.14 (6), p.513-517
Main Authors: Tamiya, Akihiro, Yamazaki, Kentaro, Boku, Narikazu, Machida, Nozomu, Kojima, Takashi, Taku, Keisei, Yasui, Hirofumi, Fukutomi, Akira, Hironaka, Shuichi, Onozawa, Yusuke
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when combined with standard chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, because this drug was approved in Japan only in 2007, there has been little experience in Japan. This study was conducted to evaluate retrospectively the safety of BV in clinical practice. Methods Sixty-five consecutive mCRC patients who received BV at our institution between June 2007 and March 2008 were selected. All patients were treated with chemotherapy in combination with BV. We surveyed the medical records of all patients for adverse events (AEs). We assessed the AEs using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Results The characteristics of the subjects were: male, 45 patients; median age, 57 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0–1, 62 patients; number of prior chemotherapy regimens 0/1/ > 2, 15/28/22 patients. The incidence of BV therapy-related AEs of all grades was: hypertension, 47.7%; proteinuria, 33.8%; bleeding, 35.3%; gastrointestinal (GI) perforation, 3.1%; thrombosis, 7.7%; and wound-healing complications, 6.2%. The incidence of grade 3/4 AEs related to BV therapy was: hypertension, 13.8%; bleeding, 1.5%; GI perforation, 1.5%; and thrombosis, 4.6%. Four patients (6.2%) had to stop chemotherapy because of the development of BV therapy-related AEs. New events of hypertension, bleeding, and proteinuria emerged until 120 days and thereafter. Conclusion The incidence of BV therapy-related AEs in this study was consistent with that observed in Western prospective clinical trials, with the exception of hypertension and proteinuria. A careful follow up is recommended for up to 120 days after the initiation of BV administration.
ISSN:1341-9625
1437-7772
DOI:10.1007/s10147-009-0911-6