Metalinguistic truisms and the emancipation of the language sciences

In his influential critiques of the theoretical foundations of the language sciences, Nigel Love claims that modern linguistics is based on “a cultural metafiction” and that it must “emancipate itself from what is no more than a profoundly important but nonetheless culturally parochial way of constr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Language sciences (Oxford) 2017-05, Vol.61, p.104-112
Main Author: Taylor, Talbot J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Breaching experiments
Cultural-discursive ecology of the language sciences
Discourse analysis
Epistemological presuppositions
Folk metalinguistic practices
Hinge certainties
Linguistics
Love, Nigel
Metafiction
Metalinguistics
Nigel Love
Normative metalinguistic commonplaces
Rhetoric
Western cultural metafiction
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In his influential critiques of the theoretical foundations of the language sciences, Nigel Love claims that modern linguistics is based on “a cultural metafiction” and that it must “emancipate itself from what is no more than a profoundly important but nonetheless culturally parochial way of construing linguistic phenomena.” This paper reviews Love's account of the historical sources and modern consequences of this cultural metafiction and asks why it is so frustratingly difficult to emancipate the language sciences from the epistemological presuppositions of this ethnocentric metafiction. In addressing these questions, the paper explores the accountability of the expert metalinguistic discourse of the language sciences to the normative rhetoric of lay metalinguistic practices – or, in Wittgenstein's distinctive use of the term, to the ‘grammar’ of those practices.
ISSN:0388-0001
1873-5746
DOI:10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.015