Reporting Does Not Equal Accountability! The Importance of Funding Characteristics and Process on Accountability

This article examines how funding arrangements affect the viability and efficiency of mechanisms for public accountability. It argues that accountability begins at the funding program planning stage. The characteristics of funding can either make reporting onerous and meaningless or can achieve acco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of public administration 2007-02, Vol.30 (2), p.209-225
Main Authors: Brown, Laura K., Troutt, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accountability
Funding
nonprofit sector
Public sector
Studies
voluntary sector
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article examines how funding arrangements affect the viability and efficiency of mechanisms for public accountability. It argues that accountability begins at the funding program planning stage. The characteristics of funding can either make reporting onerous and meaningless or can achieve accountability organically through the development of a setting in which governments and organizations alike internalize accountability as a common objective. The position presented here is that excessive emphasis on reporting is misguided because, unless reporting is both relevant and integral to the process of designing and implementing programs and services, it wastes organizational and government resources.
ISSN:0190-0692
1532-4265
DOI:10.1080/01900690601118240