On uniqueness of \(p\)-adic period morphisms, II

We prove equality of the various \(p\)-adic period morphisms for smooth, not necessarily proper, schemes. We start with showing that the \(K\)-theoretical uniqueness criterium we had found for proper smooth schemes extends to proper finite simplicial schemes in the good reduction case and to cohomol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2019-11
Main Author: Nizioł, Wiesława
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Equality
Homology
Reduction
Uniqueness
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We prove equality of the various \(p\)-adic period morphisms for smooth, not necessarily proper, schemes. We start with showing that the \(K\)-theoretical uniqueness criterium we had found for proper smooth schemes extends to proper finite simplicial schemes in the good reduction case and to cohomology with compact support in the semistable reduction case. It yields the equality of the period morphisms for cohomology with compact support defined using the syntomic, almost étale, and motivic constructions. We continue with showing that the \(h\)-cohomology period morphism agrees with the syntomic and almost étale period morphisms whenever the latter morphisms are defined. We do it by lifting the syntomic and almost étale period morphisms to Voyevodsky triangulated category of motives, where their equality with the \(h\)-cohomology period morphism can be checked directly using the Beilinson Poincaré Lemma.
ISSN:2331-8422