Separating the Decisions of Lottery Expenditures and Participation: a Truncated Tobit Approach

This study uses a sample of lottery players from three states to estimate the probability of lottery play and expenditures on lottery products using a different methodology than is used in previous studies. The authors reject the parameter restrictions implied by the standard Tobit and estimate the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public finance review 1998-03, Vol.26 (2), p.99-117
Main Authors: Stranahan, Harriet A., Borg, Mary O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Advertising
Bias
Demographics
Expected values
Expenditures
Gambling
Hypotheses
Lotteries
Public finance
Public policy
Purchasing
Restrictions
Studies
Variables
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study uses a sample of lottery players from three states to estimate the probability of lottery play and expenditures on lottery products using a different methodology than is used in previous studies. The authors reject the parameter restrictions implied by the standard Tobit and estimate the decisions of whether. to purchase lottery products and how much players spend using a probit and truncated Tobit, respectively. Overall, an interesting demographic profile of the players, which was not apparent from the results obtained by estimating the standard Tobit, emerged as a result of separating the decisions. The more general model provides new information for lottery administrators interested in designing programs that specifi cally increase market share versus programs that increase spending for those who already play regularly. This study calculates the expected value of lottery expendi tures to estimate the tax incidence associated with different lottery products. Pre vious studies calculating lottery tax regressivity have used an incorrect formula for the expected value of lottery expenditures. The authors find that the taxes on all lottery games are regressive, with instant games having the greatest regressivity
ISSN:1091-1421
1552-7530
DOI:10.1177/109114219802600201