Loading…
Almost Cover-Free Codes and Designs
An \(s\)-subset of codewords of a binary code \(X\) is said to be an {\em \((s,\ell)\)-bad} in \(X\) if the code \(X\) contains a subset of other \(\ell\) codewords such that the conjunction of the \(\ell\) codewords is covered by the disjunctive sum of the \(s\) codewords. Otherwise, the \(s\)-subs...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2015-03 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | An \(s\)-subset of codewords of a binary code \(X\) is said to be an {\em \((s,\ell)\)-bad} in \(X\) if the code \(X\) contains a subset of other \(\ell\) codewords such that the conjunction of the \(\ell\) codewords is covered by the disjunctive sum of the \(s\) codewords. Otherwise, the \(s\)-subset of codewords of \(X\) is said to be an {\em \((s,\ell)\)-good} in~\(X\).mA binary code \(X\) is said to be a cover-free \((s,\ell)\)-code if the code \(X\) does not contain \((s,\ell)\)-bad subsets. In this paper, we introduce a natural {\em probabilistic} generalization of cover-free \((s,\ell)\)-codes, namely: a binary code is said to be an almost cover-free \((s,\ell)\)-code if {\em almost all} \(s\)-subsets of its codewords are \((s,\ell)\)-good. We discuss the concept of almost cover-free \((s,\ell)\)-codes arising in combinatorial group testing problems connected with the nonadaptive search of defective supersets (complexes). We develop a random coding method based on the ensemble of binary constant weight codes to obtain lower bounds on the capacity of such codes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2331-8422 |