Loading…
Upper bounds on the solutions to \(n = p+m^2\)
Hardy and Littlewood conjectured that every large integer \(n\) that is not a square is the sum of a prime and a square. They believed that the number \(\mathcal{R}(n)\) of such representations for \(n = p+m^2\) is asymptotically given by \mathcal{R}(n) \sim \frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n}\prod_{p=3}^{\inft...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2012-04 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Hardy and Littlewood conjectured that every large integer \(n\) that is not a square is the sum of a prime and a square. They believed that the number \(\mathcal{R}(n)\) of such representations for \(n = p+m^2\) is asymptotically given by \mathcal{R}(n) \sim \frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n}\prod_{p=3}^{\infty}(1-\frac{1}{p-1}(\frac{n}{p})), where \(p\) is a prime, \(m\) is an integer, and \((\frac{n}{p})\) denotes the Legendre symbol. Unfortunately, as we will later point out, this conjecture is difficult to prove and not \emph{all} integers that are nonsquares can be represented as the sum of a prime and a square. Instead in this paper we prove two upper bounds for \(\mathcal{R}(n)\) for \(n \le N\). The first upper bound applies to \emph{all} \(n \le N\). The second upper bound depends on the possible existence of the Siegel zero, and assumes its existence, and applies to all \(N/2 < n \le N\) but at most \(\ll N^{1-\delta_1}\) of these integers, where \(N\) is a sufficiently large positive integer and \(0< \delta_1 \le 0.000025\). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2331-8422 |