Loading…

Robust Wavelet Stabilized ‘Footprints of Uncertainty’ for Fuzzy System Classifiers to Automatically Detect Sharp Waves in the EEG after Hypoxia Ischemia

Currently, there are no developed methods to detect sharp wave transients that exist in the latent phase after hypoxia-ischemia (HI) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) in order to determine if these micro-scale transients are potential biomarkers of HI. A major issue with sharp waves in the HI-EEG is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of neural systems 2017-05, Vol.27 (3), p.1650051
Main Authors: Abbasi, Hamid, Bennet, Laura, Gunn, Alistair J., Unsworth, Charles P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Currently, there are no developed methods to detect sharp wave transients that exist in the latent phase after hypoxia-ischemia (HI) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) in order to determine if these micro-scale transients are potential biomarkers of HI. A major issue with sharp waves in the HI-EEG is that they possess a large variability in their sharp wave profile making it difficult to build a compact ‘footprint of uncertainty’ (FOU) required for ideal performance of a Type-2 fuzzy logic system (FLS) classifier. In this paper, we develop a novel computational EEG analysis method to robustly detect sharp waves using over 30 h of post occlusion HI-EEG from an equivalent, in utero, preterm fetal sheep model cohort. We demonstrate that initial wavelet transform (WT) of the sharp waves stabilizes the variation in their profile and thus permits a highly compact FOU to be built, hence, optimizing the performance of a Type-2 FLS. We demonstrate that this method leads to higher overall performance of 9 4 % ± 1 for the clinical 6 4 Hz sampled EEG and 9 7 % ± 1 for the high resolution 1 0 2 4 Hz sampled EEG that is improved upon over conventional standard wavelet 6 7 % ± 5 and 8 2 % ± 3 , respectively, and fuzzy approaches 8 8 % ± 2 and 9 0 % ± 3 , respectively, when performed in isolation.
ISSN:0129-0657
1793-6462
DOI:10.1142/S0129065716500519