Loading…

Leadership development: teaching versus learning

Purpose - The purpose of this article is to elucidate the limitations of contemporary approaches to developing leaders and to present alternative approaches.Design methodology approach - This paper offers a review and critique of the assumptions on which current leadership programs are based.Finding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Management decision 2005-08, Vol.43 (7/8), p.1071-1077
Main Author: Allio, Robert J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose - The purpose of this article is to elucidate the limitations of contemporary approaches to developing leaders and to present alternative approaches.Design methodology approach - This paper offers a review and critique of the assumptions on which current leadership programs are based.Findings - Most leadership training initiatives fail to produce leaders. Typical programs teach leadership theory, concepts, and principles; they promote leadership literacy but not leadership competence. Paradoxically, however, while leadership cannot be taught, leadership can be learned. Men and women become leaders by practice, by performing deliberate acts of leadership. The primary role of a good leader (one who is competent and ethical) is to establish and reinforce values and purpose, develop vision and strategy, build community, and initiate appropriate organizational change. This behavior requires character, creativity, and compassion, core traits that cannot be acquired cognitively.Practical implications - For those charged with the responsibility of developing leaders, the three necessary steps are to select the right candidates, create learning challenges, and provide mentoring. Those who seek to develop effective leadership training programs must first establish a metric for assessing leadership effectiveness. They must then design experiments that can establish a causal or statistically significant relationship between training initiatives and leadership competency. Evidence suggests that the most effective leadership programs will focus on building self-knowledge and skills in rhetoric and critical thinking.Originality value - This paper challenges the utility of most leadership training. Leadership cannot be taught, although potential leaders can be educated.
ISSN:0025-1747
1758-6070
DOI:10.1108/00251740510610071