Loading…
An improved perturb-and-observe based MPPT method for PV systems under varying irradiation levels
•A modified perturb-and-observe-based-MPPT method is proposed.•The proposed method (PM) is tested under step/ramp changes of irradiation level.•Tracking speed by the PM is 0.025 ms against 35–52.5 ms for other 18 methods.•Steady-state efficiency by the PM is 99.48% versus 83.6–98.5% for other method...
Saved in:
Published in: | Solar energy 2018-09, Vol.171, p.547-561 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •A modified perturb-and-observe-based-MPPT method is proposed.•The proposed method (PM) is tested under step/ramp changes of irradiation level.•Tracking speed by the PM is 0.025 ms against 35–52.5 ms for other 18 methods.•Steady-state efficiency by the PM is 99.48% versus 83.6–98.5% for other methods.•Dynamic efficiency by the PM is 98.03% against 83–96.33% for other methods.
The present paper studies thoroughly the performance of the classical perturb-and-observe (P&O) method under fast-changing solar irradiation, including increase or decrease of the irradiation level with small or large steps, when the initial operating point lies to the right or left of the MPP. In sixteen case studies of sudden variation of solar irradiation, the classical P&O method fails to track MPP properly in four cases. The classical P&O tracker does not work properly under a ramp change of irradiation level. A modified P&O-based-MPP tracking method is proposed and tested under step and ramp changes of irradiation irrespective of the value and direction of the perturbation in irradiation level and the location of the initial operating point. The proposed method succeeds in capturing the MPP under a ramp or slow change of irradiation level. The proposed method tracks correctly the MPP in the above-mentioned case studies and shows better performance in tracking speed, steady state efficiency, dynamic efficiency and tracking accuracy when compared with the classical P&O method and other modified methods reported in the literature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0038-092X 1471-1257 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.080 |