Impact of cigarette smoking and vaping on the outcome of full-mouth ultrasonic scaling among patients with gingival inflammation: a prospective study

• Published in: Clinical oral investigations 2019-06, Vol.23 (6), p.2751-2758
• Main Authors: ALHarthi, Shatha Subhi, BinShabaib, Munerah, Akram, Zohaib, Rahman, Irfan, Romanos, Georgios E., Javed, Fawad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Cigarette smoking; Cigarette Smoking - adverse effects; Dental plaque; Dental Plaque Index; Dental Scaling; Dentistry; Electronic cigarettes; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Follow-Up Studies; Gingivitis - complications; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Medicine; Mouth; Original Article; Periodontal Attachment Loss; Periodontal Index; Periodontics; Plaque index; Prospective Studies; Scaling; Statistical analysis; Teeth; Ultrasonics; Vaping; Vaping - adverse effects
• ISSN: 1432-6981; 1436-3771
• DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2725-2

Objectives There are no studies that have assessed the oral soft tissue response to full-mouth ultrasonic scaling (FMUS) among cigarette-smokers (CS) (group 1), individuals vaping electronic-cigarettes (E-cigs) (group 2), and never-smokers (NS) (group 3). The aim was to assess the impact of cigarette smoking and vaping on periodontal tissues following FMUS. Materials and methods In a clinical prospective study, 89 male individuals were divided into three groups: CS (group 1), E-cig users (group 2), and NS (group 3). A questionnaire was used to gather demographic data and information regarding duration and daily frequency of CS and vaping. Full-mouth plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment loss (AL), and probing depth (PD) were measured at baseline and 3 and 6 months after FMUS (without root surface debridement). Numbers of missing teeth (MT) were also recorded. Results In groups 1, 2, and 3, 30, 28, and 31 individuals, respectively were included. In group 1, there was no statistically significant difference in mean PI and PD and numbers of sites with PD ≥ 4 mm at 6 months’ follow-up compared with baseline and 3 months’ follow-up. In groups 2 and 3, there was no significant difference in PI, BOP, and PD at 3 months’ ( P  > 0.05) and 6-months’ ( P  > 0.05) follow-up. There were no pockets with PD ≥ 4 mm at 3 and 6 months’ follow-up in groups 2 and 3. There was no difference in the numbers of MT and none of the individuals exhibited clinical AL in all groups. Conclusion Following FMUS, gingival inflammation is worse in CS compared with individuals vaping E-cigs and NS. Clinical relevance Periodontal inflammatory parameters are worse in cigarette-smokers than individuals vaping electronic cigarettes and never-smokers following FMUS. However, these findings should be interpreted with extreme caution as a number of factors may have influenced the present results.