Loading…

Immersion-free, single-pass, commercial fresh-cut produce washing system: An alternative to flume processing

•Water chemistry and product quality was compared between single-pass, flume systems.•Wash water organic load was consistent in the single-pass system during production.•No difference in bacterial counts between single-pass and flume washed produce.•Product from single-pass and flume stored for two-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Postharvest biology and technology 2018-12, Vol.146, p.124-133
Main Authors: Bornhorst, Ellen R., Luo, Yaguang, Park, Eunhee, Vinyard, Bryan T., Nou, Xiangwu, Zhou, Bin, Turner, Ellen, Millner, Patricia D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Water chemistry and product quality was compared between single-pass, flume systems.•Wash water organic load was consistent in the single-pass system during production.•No difference in bacterial counts between single-pass and flume washed produce.•Product from single-pass and flume stored for two-weeks at 1 °C had comparable quality.•Cutting may be a critical step to help prevent cross contamination, remove organics. Fresh-cut vegetable processing in the USA typically involves submerging produce in chlorinated water that is often reused and re-circulated. However, this washing practice is water and chemical intensive and subject to rapid decreases in free chlorine concentration, which may increase the probability of water mediated microbial cross-contamination. An immersion-free, single-pass produce washing system was recently developed to address these challenges by over-head spraying clean (retreated) water, rather than spent wash water. The objective of this study was to compare single-pass and flume systems during commercial processing of fresh-cut vegetables in terms of wash water physicochemical and microbiological quality and cut produce microbiological and sensorial quality. Two products, shredded iceberg lettuce and diced cabbage, were selected; processes were evaluated for each product on three separate days. Wash water and produce were sampled every 30 min during production for 2.7 h. Water that was used to wash the produce was collected from representative locations in the single-pass (input water, pre-wash, cutter, incline wash, vibra-wash) and flume (flume A, flume A catch tank, flume B, flume B catch tank) systems. Physicochemical (free chlorine, total chlorine, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity) and microbial analyses (aerobic plate count (APC)) were conducted on the wash water samples. Produce samples collected after cutting and after washing were analyzed onsite for APC immediately after collection. Final packaged products were analyzed weekly for sensorial quality (visual, olfactory, overall acceptability) during three weeks of storage at 1 °C by a trained panel using a 9-point hedonic scale. Results show that the organic load indicators in wash water samples from the single-pass system were consistent over time for most sampling locations, with no statistically significant increases in turbidity, TDS, or COD during production. In contrast, the organic load indicators in wash water samples from t
ISSN:0925-5214
1873-2356
DOI:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.08.008