Machine Learning-Based Energy Optimization for Parallel Program Execution on Multicore Chips

Energy is increasingly becoming the major constraint in designing multicore chips. Power and performance are the main components of energy and are inversely correlated. In this paper, we study the energy optimization of multicore chips that process parallel workloads using either power or performanc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011) 2018-12, Vol.43 (12), p.7343-7358
Main Authors: Otoom, Mwaffaq, Trancoso, Pedro, Alzubaidi, Mohammad A., Almasaeid, Hisham
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Artificial intelligence
Chips
Correlation analysis
Engineering
Humanities and Social Sciences
Machine learning
Microprocessors
multidisciplinary
Optimization
Parallel programming
Power consumption
Power efficiency
Power management
Research Article - Computer Engineering and Computer Science
Science
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Energy is increasingly becoming the major constraint in designing multicore chips. Power and performance are the main components of energy and are inversely correlated. In this paper, we study the energy optimization of multicore chips that process parallel workloads using either power or performance optimization. To do so, we propose novel machine learning-based global and dynamic power management controller. The controller is used either to maximize performance within a fixed power budget or to minimize the consumed power to achieve the same baseline performance. The controller is also scalable, as it does not incur significant overhead as the number of cores or demands increases. The technique was evaluated using the PARSEC benchmark suite on a full-system simulator. The experimental results show that our global power controller outperforms, in terms of the EDP metric, the non-DVFS baseline by 28 and 35.5%, when optimized for performance and power, respectively. This suggests that optimizing power is more related to energy efficiency than optimizing performance.
ISSN:2193-567X
1319-8025
2191-4281
DOI:10.1007/s13369-018-3079-4