Kelvin-cell-based metal foam heat exchanger with elliptical struts for low energy consumption

• Published in: Applied thermal engineering 2018-11, Vol.144, p.540-550
• Main Authors: Moon, Chanhee, Kim, Hyun Dong, Kim, Kyung Chun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Circularity; Computational fluid dynamics; Cross-sections; Dimensionless numbers; Elliptical strut; Energy consumption; Fluid flow; Friction; Friction drag; Heat exchanger; Heat exchangers; Heat transfer; Kelvin-cell; Metal foam; Metal foams; Pressure; Pressure drag; Pressure drop; Pumping power; Struts; Studies; Thermal resistance; Tortuosity; Velocity
• ISSN: 1359-4311; 1873-5606
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.07.110

•Kelvin-cell-based metal foam (KMF) with elliptical struts is proposed.•The fluid flow, heat transfer, and performance characteristics of five different KMFs are investigated.•The pumping work of the KMF with elliptical struts is 32% less than that with circular struts. Conventional Kelvin-cell-based metal foam (KMF) has triangular or circular struts. This study proposes a KMF with elliptical struts instead of such struts. Two schemes of transforming a circular strut into an elliptical strut are proposed: (1) maintaining the same circumference as the circular strut cross-section and (2) maintaining the same cross-section area as the circular strut cross-section. Five KMFs with different struts were designed. The fluid flow, heat transfer, and performance characteristics of the KMFs were numerically investigated. Two dimensionless diameters for the strut section are introduced to analyze the hydro-thermal characteristics of KMFs: λa, the major diameter ratio of the elliptical strut to the circular strut, and λb, the minor diameter ratio of the elliptical strut to the circular strut. The major axis of all struts was set parallel to the main flow direction. The pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics of KMFs are explained by the pressure drag and friction drag. As λb decreases from 1.000 to 0.556, the pressure drop of the KMF decreases by 44% because the pressure drag and blockage ratio decrease with λb. However, the decrease of λb results in decreases in the free stream velocity around the strut, which has a penalty on the heat transfer performance. This can be partially compensated by increasing λa by increasing the flow tortuosity, surface area, and separation angle. Therefore, using the scheme with the same cross-sectional area provides better performance than using the scheme with the same circumference. A KMF using the scheme with the same cross-section area scheme required 32% less pumping power than a KMF with circular struts and the same thermal resistance.