Loading…
Securing the Future of the US Biomedical Research Workforce
Since the end of World War II, the US' preeminence in biomedical research has been widely recognized. There are a number of features of the US system that are responsible for its success, but surely one of the most important was the early embrace of high levels of federal research investment, c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Issues in science and technology 2019-01, Vol.35 (2), p.50-52 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Since the end of World War II, the US' preeminence in biomedical research has been widely recognized. There are a number of features of the US system that are responsible for its success, but surely one of the most important was the early embrace of high levels of federal research investment, coupled with the allocation of funds on a competitive, peer-reviewed basis. This trait is credited with helping the nation create a vibrant and innovative ecosystem for the advancement of knowledge and the human condition, and the US system has been emulated throughout the world. The problems are many, and interwoven: The cost of conducting research has steadily risen, and the size of federal research awards has not kept pace. At the same time, the biomedical research workforce is aging, and a shrinking percentage of federal research grants are awarded to young scientists, who often spend many years in postdoctoral positions characterized by low pay and no guarantee of mentorship or career development. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0748-5492 1938-1557 |