Loading…

Elevated urinary plasmin activity resistant to  2-antiplasmin in acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis

Background. A pathogenic role of intraglomerular plasmin bound to nephritogenic antigen (nephritis-associated plasmin receptor, NAPlr) and resistant to physiologic inhibitors such as α[sub]2-antiplasmin (α[sub]2-AP) has recently been proposed in acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis (APSGN). To...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2008-05, Vol.23 (7), p.2254-2259
Main Authors: Oda, T., Tamura, K., Yoshizawa, N., Sugisaki, T., Matsumoto, K., Hattori, M., Sawai, T., Namikoshi, T., Yamada, M., Kikuchi, Y., Suzuki, S., Miura, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background. A pathogenic role of intraglomerular plasmin bound to nephritogenic antigen (nephritis-associated plasmin receptor, NAPlr) and resistant to physiologic inhibitors such as α[sub]2-antiplasmin (α[sub]2-AP) has recently been proposed in acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis (APSGN). To confirm this concept, we analysed the urinary profile of plasmin cascade in APSGN patients. Methods. Urine samples from 10 patients with APSGN, 12 patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN), 10 patients with streptococcal infection without nephritis (SI) and 10 healthy control subjects were analysed. The α[sub]2-AP-resistant plasmin activity was assessed by a chromogenic assay after α[sub]2-AP was added to each urine sample. Urinary plasminogen activator (PA) and plasmin were further analysed by polyacrylamide gel zymography. Urinary NAPlr was assessed by western blot analysis in selected samples. Results. Urinary α[sub]2-AP-resistant plasmin activity corrected for creatinine concentration (units/g · creatinine) was significantly higher in patients with APSGN (2.99 ± 0.63) than in patients with IgAN (1.02 ± 0.20, P < 0.01), SI (0.79 ± 0.17, P < 0.01), or in healthy control subjects (0.73 ± 0.18, P < 0.01). This tendency was confirmed by casein gel zymography. However urinary PA activity assessed by plasminogen-casein gel zymography did not differ between groups. NAPlr was detected in the urine of APSGN patients. Conclusions. We found elevated urinary plasmin activity resistant to α[sub]2-AP, which may be due to urinary excretion of NAPlr in patients with APSGN. This result supports the pathogenic role of the NAPlr-plasmin complex in the development of APSGN. Furthermore, α[sub]2-AP-resistant urinary plasmin activity may be useful as a diagnostic marker for APSGN.
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfm937