Implications of Model Uncertainty for Bank Stress Testing

We aim to raise the awareness that model uncertainty stemming from stress test satellite equations that relate bank risk parameters to macro-financial variables can be significant. Based on a set of credit risk models derived by means of a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) methodology we conduct a stre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of financial services research 2019-02, Vol.55 (1), p.31-58
Main Authors: Gross, Marco, Población, Javier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Averages
Bayesian analysis
Capital
Conservatism
Credit risk
Economic models
Economics and Finance
Finance
Financial Services
Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics
Optimism
Stress
Uncertainty
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We aim to raise the awareness that model uncertainty stemming from stress test satellite equations that relate bank risk parameters to macro-financial variables can be significant. Based on a set of credit risk models derived by means of a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) methodology we conduct a stress test for 75 European banks to highlight that i) an optimistic equation choice can imply significantly overstated capital estimates, ii) model uncertainty contributes on average about 35% to overall uncertainty in our application, and iii) the impact of model uncertainty feeding through regulatory risk weights can easily turn twice as sizable as that from loan losses. Model methods that account for model uncertainty, such as the BMA, should mitigate the risks arising along these three dimensions and help establish a level playing field with regard to an equal extent of conservatism across banks.
ISSN:0920-8550
1573-0735
DOI:10.1007/s10693-017-0275-4