Loading…
Vermont Yankee and the Evolution of Administrative Procedure: A Somewhat Different View
The Supreme Court's decision in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. is a needed corrective to an unwholesome trend in the lower federal courts. The decision establishes the principle that federal courts may not, except under extraordinary circumstances,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Harvard law review 1978-06, Vol.91 (8), p.1823-1832 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The Supreme Court's decision in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. is a needed corrective to an unwholesome trend in the lower federal courts. The decision establishes the principle that federal courts may not, except under extraordinary circumstances, require federal administrative agencies to employ procedural formalities beyond those specified in the Administrative Procedure Act or other relevant statutes. While there are many cases in which new procedures might be needed in order to produce a record adequate for judicial review, it is not the province of the courts to impose such procedures. It is the responsibility of the agency, not the reviewing court, to determine how the agency should conduct its business and allocate its resources. This is the approach adopted by the Administrative Conference of the U.S. in its recommendations 72-5 and 76-3. Although the judiciary has a duty to uphold the law, it also has a responsibility to recognize and defer to the responsibilities of other branches of government, including the administrative component. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-811X 2161-976X |
DOI: | 10.2307/1340410 |