Loading…

Multi-informant evaluation of students' psychosocial status through SDQ in a national Greek sample

This paper presents evidence from a European funded program with national contribution regarding the screening of students using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The aim of the present study is two-fold: a) to provide a thorough investigation of the factor structure of the Greek p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Children and youth services review 2019-01, Vol.96, p.47-54
Main Authors: Bibou-Nakou, I., Markos, A., Padeliadu, S., Chatzilampou, P., Ververidou, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper presents evidence from a European funded program with national contribution regarding the screening of students using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The aim of the present study is two-fold: a) to provide a thorough investigation of the factor structure of the Greek parent, teacher, and student versions of the SDQ, and b) to examine psychosocial functioning of a non-clinical student sample, as well as potential differences as a function of student gender, age, grade or year of schooling, and immigration background The study instruments (SDQ, The Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, and The Classmate Support Scale) were administered to a national sample of 6290 students, aged 11 to 15 years. Results provided support for the hypothesised five-factor structure of the SDQ. Agreement was higher between parent and student reports. Immigrants had higher scores in total difficulties, hyperactivity-inattention, and emotional problems than natives, whereas natives were given higher scores on peer problems and prosocial behaviour. Assessing the psychosocial well being of students' based on a multi-informant approach has implications for schools and mental health professionals.
ISSN:0190-7409
1873-7765
DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.022