Loading…

The Effect of HMX Impurity and Irganox Antioxidant on Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of RDX by TG/DSC Non‐Isothermal Method

The non‐isothermal TG/DTG/DSC technique has been used to study the thermal decomposition of RDX as pure and impure (contain 5 wt. % HMX) in the absence and presence of 5 wt. % irganox 1010 antioxidant under nitrogen atmosphere at different heating rates (4, 6, 8, and 10 °C min−1). The DSC curves sho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics explosives, pyrotechnics, 2019-04, Vol.44 (4), p.429-437
Main Authors: Sinapour, Hamid, Damiri, Sajjad, Ravanbod, Mohsen, Pouretedal, Hamid R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The non‐isothermal TG/DTG/DSC technique has been used to study the thermal decomposition of RDX as pure and impure (contain 5 wt. % HMX) in the absence and presence of 5 wt. % irganox 1010 antioxidant under nitrogen atmosphere at different heating rates (4, 6, 8, and 10 °C min−1). The DSC curves show an exothermic peak for decomposition of RDX exactly after its melting point. The activation energy (Ea) for thermal decomposition of pure and impure RDX in the absence and presence of irganox was calculated using non‐isothermal isoconversional methods of KAS, OFW, and Friedman for different conversion fraction (α) values in the range of 0.1–0.9. The pre‐exponential factor (A) and the kinetic model have been determined by means of the compensation effect and the selected model is confirmed by the nonlinear fitting method. The activation energies for thermal decomposition of pure RDX in the absence and presence of irganox are 240.5 to 246.2 and 330.0 to 350.6 kJ mol−1 with the reaction model of R3 and D2, respectively, whereas; the Ea values for decomposition of impure RDX in the absence and presence of antioxidant are 172.1 to 173.0 and 195.3 to 214.2 kJ mol−1, respectively, with the reaction model of R2 for both of them.
ISSN:0721-3115
1521-4087
DOI:10.1002/prep.201800236