Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
Background: Patients receiving chemotherapy often develop anemia. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp™) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating glycoprotein that has been shown, in dose-finding studies, to be safe and clinically active when administered to patients with cancer every 1, 2, or 3 weeks. This phase III...
Saved in:
Published in: | JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002-08, Vol.94 (16), p.1211-1220 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Patients receiving chemotherapy often develop anemia. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp™) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating glycoprotein that has been shown, in dose-finding studies, to be safe and clinically active when administered to patients with cancer every 1, 2, or 3 weeks. This phase III study compared the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alfa with placebo in patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy. Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 320 anemic patients (hemoglobin ≤11.0 g/dL) were randomly assigned to receive darbepoetin alfa or placebo injections weekly for 12 weeks. The 297 patients who completed at least the first 28 days of study were assessed for red blood cell transfusions, the primary endpoint. Patients were also assessed for hemoglobin concentration (i.e., hematopoietic response), adverse events, antibody formation to darbepoetin alfa, hospitalizations, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)–Fatigue score, and disease outcome. Efficacy endpoints were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analyses, Cox proportional hazards analyses, and chi-square tests where appropriate. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Patients receiving darbepoetin alfa required fewer transfusions (27% versus 52%; mean difference = 25%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14% to 36%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0027-8874 1460-2105 1460-2105 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jnci/94.16.1211 |