Loading…

Comparison of Two Covariance Structures in the Analysis of Clustered Polytomous Data using Generalized Estimating Equations

Arguably, the use of model-based matrices as working covariance matrices in the analysis of clustered polytomous data by generalized estimating equations has the potential for greater efficiency. However, a failure to ensure that the estimated parameter values for the model-based matrices do indeed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biometrics 1998-03, Vol.54 (1), p.312-316
Main Author: Hines, R. J. O'Hara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Arguably, the use of model-based matrices as working covariance matrices in the analysis of clustered polytomous data by generalized estimating equations has the potential for greater efficiency. However, a failure to ensure that the estimated parameter values for the model-based matrices do indeed produce covariance matrices that are actually positive definite during the iterative process creates a serious risk of nonconvergence of estimators. This paper explores the performances of two classes of covariance matrices as possible working matrices for the analysis of clustered multinomial data. One class of matrices corresponds to the conventional standardizing of each multinomial observation involved, component by component. The other class results from standardizing the multinomial observation as a unit. While the two classes of matrices are found to provide similar efficiencies, independent of the choice of the working correlation matrix, they differ noticeably in the degree to which nonconvergence of the estimators occurs when random samples from a large set of data are repeatedly analyzed.
ISSN:0006-341X
1541-0420
DOI:10.2307/2534017