Loading…

Systemic Exposure of Rituximab Increased by Ibrutinib: Pharmacokinetic Results and Modeling Based on the HELIOS Trial

Introduction In the HELIOS trial, bendamustine/rituximab (BR) plus ibrutinib (BR-I) improved disease outcomes versus BR plus placebo in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Here, we describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) observations, along with modeling to further...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pharmaceutical research 2019-07, Vol.36 (7), p.93-12, Article 93
Main Authors: Lavezzi, Silvia Maria, de Jong, Jan, Neyens, Martine, Cramer, Paula, Demirkan, Fatih, Fraser, Graeme, Bartlett, Nancy, Dilhuydy, Marie-Sarah, Loscertales, Javier, Avigdor, Abraham, Rule, Simon, Samoilova, Olga, Goy, Andre, Ganguly, Siddhartha, Salman, Mariya, Howes, Angela, Mahler, Michelle, De Nicolao, Giuseppe, Poggesi, Italo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction In the HELIOS trial, bendamustine/rituximab (BR) plus ibrutinib (BR-I) improved disease outcomes versus BR plus placebo in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Here, we describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) observations, along with modeling to further explore the interaction between ibrutinib and rituximab. Methods 578 subjects were randomized to ibrutinib or placebo with BR (6 cycles). Ibrutinib PK samples and tumor measurements were obtained from all subjects; a subset was evaluated for bendamustine and rituximab PK. Population rituximab PK was assessed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Results Dose-normalized plasma concentration-time bendamustine data were comparable between the arms. Systemic rituximab exposure was higher with BR-I versus BR; mean trough serum concentrations were 2- to 3-fold higher in the first three cycles and 1.2- to 1.7-fold higher subsequently. No relevant safety differences were observed. In the modeling, including treatment arm as a categorical covariate and tumor burden as a continuous time-varying covariate on overall rituximab clearance significantly improved fitting of the data. Conclusions BR-I led to higher dose-normalized systemic rituximab exposure versus BR and more rapid steady-state achievement. The modeling data suggest that rituximab disposition is, at least in part, target mediated. Determining the clinical significance of these findings requires further assessments. Trial Registration This study is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01611090 .
ISSN:0724-8741
1573-904X
DOI:10.1007/s11095-019-2605-8