Psychopolitical validity: power, culture, and wellness

In this commentary, the authors review and critique Prilleltensky's model of psychopolitical validity and wellness. Although the overt recognition of power, oppression, and political forces are viewed most favorably, cautions are also given. Of most importance is the way in which his model is b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of community psychology 2008-03, Vol.36 (2), p.261-268
Main Authors: Fisher, Adrian T., Sonn, Christopher C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Community
Cultural Differences
Political science
Power Structure
Psychological Studies
Psychology
Social Justice
Social Systems
Validity
Wellness
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this commentary, the authors review and critique Prilleltensky's model of psychopolitical validity and wellness. Although the overt recognition of power, oppression, and political forces are viewed most favorably, cautions are also given. Of most importance is the way in which his model is based in an undeclared North American model of psychology and culture. The authors examine the disjuncture between the stated aims of psychopolitical validity and the ways in which different cultures and social systems construe the world. The proposal for a political focus on power and oppression is welcomed, but cautions are offered about the commensurability of different worldviews and practices. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:0090-4392
1520-6629
DOI:10.1002/jcop.20237