Determination of cross-sectional area of natural plant fibres and fibre failure analysis by in situ SEM observation during microtensile tests

Reported tensile mechanical properties of many natural plant fibres vary to a large extent due to very often inappropriate measurement of the fibre’s cross-sectional area by diameter estimation. Using natural ramie filament as a model testing elementary fibre, a more realistic stereological determin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cellulose (London) 2019-05, Vol.26 (8), p.4693-4706
Main Authors: Yue, Hangbo, Rubalcaba, Juan C., Cui, Yingde, Fernández-Blázquez, Juan P., Yang, Chufen, Shuttleworth, Peter S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bioorganic Chemistry
Ceramics
Change detection
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Composites
Cross-sections
Deformation mechanisms
Elastic deformation
Failure analysis
Glass
Hydrogen bonds
Mechanical properties
Model testing
Natural Materials
Organic Chemistry
Original Research
Physical Chemistry
Polymer Sciences
Slippage
Sustainable Development
Tensile tests
Vegetable fibers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Reported tensile mechanical properties of many natural plant fibres vary to a large extent due to very often inappropriate measurement of the fibre’s cross-sectional area by diameter estimation. Using natural ramie filament as a model testing elementary fibre, a more realistic stereological determination is presented, including microscopic imaging analysis of the fibres’ cross-sectional area. When applying the area data using this approach to calculate tensile strength, a far narrower variation in the fibres’ strength distribution according to Weibull analysis was found. The gauge length effects on the mechanical performance of the natural fibre were revealed and analysed. In addition, in situ SEM observations during microtensile measurements detected real time changes in the fibres’ structure during stress. It was found that fibre failure was mainly caused by macroscopic physical defects and associated microscopic slippage of the microfibrils. Furthermore, results of cyclic tensile tests indicated that the fibre underwent elastic deformations under progressive loading–unloading cycles, which is due to bonding restriction that the surrounding matrix presents against the slippage of the microfibrils and reorganisation of hydrogen bonds. Graphical abstract
ISSN:0969-0239
1572-882X
DOI:10.1007/s10570-019-02428-7