Peri-Operative Anaesthetic Documentation: A Report of Three Sequential Audits on the Quality of Outcomes, with an Insight Into Surrounding Legal Issues

Objective: The aim of the audits was to assess contemporary performance, with comparison of the same against previous outcomes, to gauge trends in clinical practice. This allowed for completion of the audit cycle, as well as the ability to analyse and consistently improve the quality of care deliver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation 2018-09, Vol.46 (5), p.354
Main Authors: Curtis, William Brett, Sethi, Rajesh, Thavarajah Visvanathan, Sethi, Swati
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anesthesia
Audits
Data collection
Documentation
Ethics
Intensive care
Medical personnel
Patients
Quality control
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: The aim of the audits was to assess contemporary performance, with comparison of the same against previous outcomes, to gauge trends in clinical practice. This allowed for completion of the audit cycle, as well as the ability to analyse and consistently improve the quality of care delivered to our patients. Methods: We undertook three prospective audits on the quality of peri-operative anaesthetic documentation in the years 2009, 2011 and 2014, respectively. Anaesthetic records for patients undergoing elective as well as emergency surgical procedures were assessed for ‘adequacy of peri-operative documentation’ based on a combination of select criteria outlined by the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Results: A total of 1000 anaesthetic records were analysed in 2009, followed by a review of 412 records and 376 documents in 2011 and 2014 respectively. In the year 2014, 43.8% of pre-operative anaesthetic records were ‘appropriately’ documented. This was in stark comparison to 16.3% and 25.9% in the years 2009 and 2011, respectively. The quantity of ‘adequately’ documented intra-operative records increased to 35.1% in 2014, in comparison to 25.5% and 22.7% in 2009 and 2011, respectively. There was an overall improvement in the standards of peri-operative documentation in consecutive audits. Conclusion: We propose that regular audits on ‘anaesthetic record keeping’ can lead to an improvement in the standards of this often overlooked, but essential scope of our practice.
ISSN:2667-677X
2667-6370
DOI:10.5152/TJAR.2018.40222