Periodic Direct Current Does Not Promote Wound Closure in an In Vitro Dynamic Model of Cell Migration/Invited Commentary/Author Response

Background and Purpose. A prevailing paradigm is that electrical fields can promote cell migration and tissue healing. To further validate this paradigm, we tested the hypothesis that periodic direct current (DC) can enhance wound closure using an in vitro dynamic model of cell migration. Methods an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical therapy 2006-01, Vol.86 (1), p.50
Main Authors: Godbout, Charles, Frenette, Jérôme, Spielholz, Neil I
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cell adhesion & migration
Cells
Electric currents
Injuries
Reproductive technologies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and Purpose. A prevailing paradigm is that electrical fields can promote cell migration and tissue healing. To further validate this paradigm, we tested the hypothesis that periodic direct current (DC) can enhance wound closure using an in vitro dynamic model of cell migration. Methods and Results. Layers of primary fibroblasts were wounded and treated with DC under various voltages. Repair area, cell velocity, and directionality as well as lamellipodium area were evaluated at different times. Direct current had no beneficial effect on cell migration. Moreover, prolonged stimulation under the highest voltage led to significant reduction in wound closure and cell velocity. The reduction of membrane protusions in stimulated cells may be associated with the deleterious effect of DC. Discussion and Conclusion. Contrary to the authors' expectations, they found that periodic DC did not promote wound closure, a finding that emphasizes the need to clarify the complex effects of electrical fields on migrating cells. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0031-9023
1538-6724