Fund-raising models at public historically Black colleges and universities

This empirical study examined whether public historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) predominantly practiced the press agentry, public information, two-way asymmetrical, two-way symmetrical or mixed motive models of fund raising. The findings reported the heavy usage of press agentry mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public relations review 2007-06, Vol.33 (2), p.201-205
Main Author: Tindall, Natalie T.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Colleges and universities
Fund raising
Historically Black Colleges & Universities
Mixed motive model
Public relations
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-df5369aeaf422d18eb157c875d4136a5990bd042fc08ea8e32bc34d2c6e8c80a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-df5369aeaf422d18eb157c875d4136a5990bd042fc08ea8e32bc34d2c6e8c80a3
container_end_page 205
container_issue 2
container_start_page 201
container_title Public relations review
container_volume 33
creator Tindall, Natalie T.J.
description This empirical study examined whether public historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) predominantly practiced the press agentry, public information, two-way asymmetrical, two-way symmetrical or mixed motive models of fund raising. The findings reported the heavy usage of press agentry model of fund raising by advancement officers. The most interesting concept emerging from the research was the emergence of a mixed motive model of fund raising. The model describes the practice of fund raising in an adaptable and changing environment and incorporates asymmetrical and symmetrical tactics that describes the actual practice of fund raising.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224974958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0363811107000215</els_id><sourcerecordid>1266372251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-df5369aeaf422d18eb157c875d4136a5990bd042fc08ea8e32bc34d2c6e8c80a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAURi0EEqXwDxgi9oTrV-IsSIAoD1Vigdly7JvikCbFTir135MqzEx3Od-50iHkmkJGgea3TbYbq4D7jAEUGbAMQJyQBVUFT4XkxSlZAM95qiil5-QixgYAZEnlgrytxs6lwfjou02y7R22MTFDMglbb5MvH4c-eGva9pA8tMZ-J7ZvW9zgRHUuGTu_xxD94DFekrPatBGv_u6SfK6ePh5f0vX78-vj_Tq1nPMhdbXkeWnQ1IIxRxVWVBZWFdIJynMjyxIqB4LVFhQahZxVlgvHbI7KKjB8SW5m7y70PyPGQTf9GLrppWZMlIUopZogMUM29DEGrPUu-K0JB01BH6PpRs_R9DGaBqanaNPsbp5NGXDvMehoPXYWnQ9oB-16_7_gFyEheCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224974958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fund-raising models at public historically Black colleges and universities</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Tindall, Natalie T.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tindall, Natalie T.J.</creatorcontrib><description>This empirical study examined whether public historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) predominantly practiced the press agentry, public information, two-way asymmetrical, two-way symmetrical or mixed motive models of fund raising. The findings reported the heavy usage of press agentry model of fund raising by advancement officers. The most interesting concept emerging from the research was the emergence of a mixed motive model of fund raising. The model describes the practice of fund raising in an adaptable and changing environment and incorporates asymmetrical and symmetrical tactics that describes the actual practice of fund raising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-8111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PREREL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Silver Spring: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Colleges and universities ; Fund raising ; Historically Black Colleges &amp; Universities ; Mixed motive model ; Public relations ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Public relations review, 2007-06, Vol.33 (2), p.201-205</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-df5369aeaf422d18eb157c875d4136a5990bd042fc08ea8e32bc34d2c6e8c80a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-df5369aeaf422d18eb157c875d4136a5990bd042fc08ea8e32bc34d2c6e8c80a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tindall, Natalie T.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Fund-raising models at public historically Black colleges and universities</title><title>Public relations review</title><description>This empirical study examined whether public historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) predominantly practiced the press agentry, public information, two-way asymmetrical, two-way symmetrical or mixed motive models of fund raising. The findings reported the heavy usage of press agentry model of fund raising by advancement officers. The most interesting concept emerging from the research was the emergence of a mixed motive model of fund raising. The model describes the practice of fund raising in an adaptable and changing environment and incorporates asymmetrical and symmetrical tactics that describes the actual practice of fund raising.</description><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Fund raising</subject><subject>Historically Black Colleges &amp; Universities</subject><subject>Mixed motive model</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0363-8111</issn><issn>1873-4537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAURi0EEqXwDxgi9oTrV-IsSIAoD1Vigdly7JvikCbFTir135MqzEx3Od-50iHkmkJGgea3TbYbq4D7jAEUGbAMQJyQBVUFT4XkxSlZAM95qiil5-QixgYAZEnlgrytxs6lwfjou02y7R22MTFDMglbb5MvH4c-eGva9pA8tMZ-J7ZvW9zgRHUuGTu_xxD94DFekrPatBGv_u6SfK6ePh5f0vX78-vj_Tq1nPMhdbXkeWnQ1IIxRxVWVBZWFdIJynMjyxIqB4LVFhQahZxVlgvHbI7KKjB8SW5m7y70PyPGQTf9GLrppWZMlIUopZogMUM29DEGrPUu-K0JB01BH6PpRs_R9DGaBqanaNPsbp5NGXDvMehoPXYWnQ9oB-16_7_gFyEheCE</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Tindall, Natalie T.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Fund-raising models at public historically Black colleges and universities</title><author>Tindall, Natalie T.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-df5369aeaf422d18eb157c875d4136a5990bd042fc08ea8e32bc34d2c6e8c80a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Fund raising</topic><topic>Historically Black Colleges &amp; Universities</topic><topic>Mixed motive model</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tindall, Natalie T.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tindall, Natalie T.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fund-raising models at public historically Black colleges and universities</atitle><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>201-205</pages><issn>0363-8111</issn><eissn>1873-4537</eissn><coden>PREREL</coden><abstract>This empirical study examined whether public historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) predominantly practiced the press agentry, public information, two-way asymmetrical, two-way symmetrical or mixed motive models of fund raising. The findings reported the heavy usage of press agentry model of fund raising by advancement officers. The most interesting concept emerging from the research was the emergence of a mixed motive model of fund raising. The model describes the practice of fund raising in an adaptable and changing environment and incorporates asymmetrical and symmetrical tactics that describes the actual practice of fund raising.</abstract><cop>Silver Spring</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-8111
ispartof Public relations review, 2007-06, Vol.33 (2), p.201-205
issn 0363-8111
1873-4537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_224974958
source Elsevier; PAIS Index
subjects Colleges and universities
Fund raising
Historically Black Colleges & Universities
Mixed motive model
Public relations
Studies
title Fund-raising models at public historically Black colleges and universities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A48%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fund-raising%20models%20at%20public%20historically%20Black%20colleges%20and%20universities&rft.jtitle=Public%20relations%20review&rft.au=Tindall,%20Natalie%20T.J.&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=201-205&rft.issn=0363-8111&rft.eissn=1873-4537&rft.coden=PREREL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1266372251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-df5369aeaf422d18eb157c875d4136a5990bd042fc08ea8e32bc34d2c6e8c80a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224974958&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true