Loading…

Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles

•Gaze behaviour and EDA are reliable continuous measures of trust in automation.•Gaze behaviour and EDA, when combined, predict trust better than individually.•Automated vehicle behaviour does not need to be perfect, but predictable.•Unexpected system failures strongly and negatively impact drivers’...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2019-07, Vol.64, p.401-412
Main Authors: Walker, F., Wang, J., Martens, M.H., Verwey, W.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1ad2ec2b25510fd05a456a407d2666232ac81b3e26d759423fcdd51f191b5a1e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1ad2ec2b25510fd05a456a407d2666232ac81b3e26d759423fcdd51f191b5a1e3
container_end_page 412
container_issue
container_start_page 401
container_title Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour
container_volume 64
creator Walker, F.
Wang, J.
Martens, M.H.
Verwey, W.B.
description •Gaze behaviour and EDA are reliable continuous measures of trust in automation.•Gaze behaviour and EDA, when combined, predict trust better than individually.•Automated vehicle behaviour does not need to be perfect, but predictable.•Unexpected system failures strongly and negatively impact drivers’ trust. Studies show that drivers’ intention to use automated vehicles is strongly modulated by trust. It follows that their benefits are unlikely to be achieved if users do not trust them. To date, most studies of trust in automated vehicles have relied on self-reports. However, questionnaires cannot capture real-time changes in drivers’ trust, and are hard to use in applied settings. In previous work, we found evidence that gaze behaviour could provide an effective measure of trust. In this study we tested whether combining gaze behaviour with Electrodermal Activity could provide a stronger metric. The results indicated a strong relationship between self-reported trust, monitoring behaviour and Electrodermal Activity: The higher participants’ self-reported trust, the less they monitored the road, the more attention they paid to a non-driving related secondary task, and the lower their Electrodermal Activity. We also found evidence that combined measures of gaze behaviour and Electrodermal Activity predict self-reported trust better than either of these measures on its own. These findings suggest that such combined measures have the potential to provide a reliable and objective real-time indicator of driver trust.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.021
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2283328896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1369847818306703</els_id><sourcerecordid>2283328896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1ad2ec2b25510fd05a456a407d2666232ac81b3e26d759423fcdd51f191b5a1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhiMEEqVwAHaWWCf4ETsJrFAFBalSN7C2HHtCHSVNsZ1IZcU1uB4nwVVZs5qH5p_550uSa4Izgom4bbPgmoxiUmWYZ5iSk2RGyoKlnJPiNOZMVGmZF-V5cuF9izHOKSlmyftSfQKqYaMmO4wOqa1B0IEObjDgetUhpYOdbNjfoXXdwqEA1IPyowOPhgYZFzvO_3x9o-BGH5DdIjWGoVcBDJpgY3UH_jI5a1Tn4eovzpO3p8fXxXO6Wi9fFg-rVLNKhJQoQ0HTmkbbuDGYq5wLlePCUCEEZVTpktQMqDAFr3LKGm0MJw2pSM0VATZPbo57d274GMEH2ca3tvGkpLRkjJZlJeIUOU5pN3jvoJE7Z3vl9pJgeeApWxl5ygNPibmMPKPm_qiBaH-y4KTXFrYajHURizSD_Uf9C7lwf_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283328896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Walker, F. ; Wang, J. ; Martens, M.H. ; Verwey, W.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, F. ; Wang, J. ; Martens, M.H. ; Verwey, W.B.</creatorcontrib><description>•Gaze behaviour and EDA are reliable continuous measures of trust in automation.•Gaze behaviour and EDA, when combined, predict trust better than individually.•Automated vehicle behaviour does not need to be perfect, but predictable.•Unexpected system failures strongly and negatively impact drivers’ trust. Studies show that drivers’ intention to use automated vehicles is strongly modulated by trust. It follows that their benefits are unlikely to be achieved if users do not trust them. To date, most studies of trust in automated vehicles have relied on self-reports. However, questionnaires cannot capture real-time changes in drivers’ trust, and are hard to use in applied settings. In previous work, we found evidence that gaze behaviour could provide an effective measure of trust. In this study we tested whether combining gaze behaviour with Electrodermal Activity could provide a stronger metric. The results indicated a strong relationship between self-reported trust, monitoring behaviour and Electrodermal Activity: The higher participants’ self-reported trust, the less they monitored the road, the more attention they paid to a non-driving related secondary task, and the lower their Electrodermal Activity. We also found evidence that combined measures of gaze behaviour and Electrodermal Activity predict self-reported trust better than either of these measures on its own. These findings suggest that such combined measures have the potential to provide a reliable and objective real-time indicator of driver trust.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Automated driving ; Automobile drivers ; Drivers ; Electric vehicles ; Electrodermal Activity ; Eye movement behaviour ; Real time ; Secondary task ; Toll roads ; Trust ; Trust calibration ; Trust in automation</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2019-07, Vol.64, p.401-412</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1ad2ec2b25510fd05a456a407d2666232ac81b3e26d759423fcdd51f191b5a1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1ad2ec2b25510fd05a456a407d2666232ac81b3e26d759423fcdd51f191b5a1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martens, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verwey, W.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles</title><title>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</title><description>•Gaze behaviour and EDA are reliable continuous measures of trust in automation.•Gaze behaviour and EDA, when combined, predict trust better than individually.•Automated vehicle behaviour does not need to be perfect, but predictable.•Unexpected system failures strongly and negatively impact drivers’ trust. Studies show that drivers’ intention to use automated vehicles is strongly modulated by trust. It follows that their benefits are unlikely to be achieved if users do not trust them. To date, most studies of trust in automated vehicles have relied on self-reports. However, questionnaires cannot capture real-time changes in drivers’ trust, and are hard to use in applied settings. In previous work, we found evidence that gaze behaviour could provide an effective measure of trust. In this study we tested whether combining gaze behaviour with Electrodermal Activity could provide a stronger metric. The results indicated a strong relationship between self-reported trust, monitoring behaviour and Electrodermal Activity: The higher participants’ self-reported trust, the less they monitored the road, the more attention they paid to a non-driving related secondary task, and the lower their Electrodermal Activity. We also found evidence that combined measures of gaze behaviour and Electrodermal Activity predict self-reported trust better than either of these measures on its own. These findings suggest that such combined measures have the potential to provide a reliable and objective real-time indicator of driver trust.</description><subject>Automated driving</subject><subject>Automobile drivers</subject><subject>Drivers</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Electrodermal Activity</subject><subject>Eye movement behaviour</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Secondary task</subject><subject>Toll roads</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Trust calibration</subject><subject>Trust in automation</subject><issn>1369-8478</issn><issn>1873-5517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhiMEEqVwAHaWWCf4ETsJrFAFBalSN7C2HHtCHSVNsZ1IZcU1uB4nwVVZs5qH5p_550uSa4Izgom4bbPgmoxiUmWYZ5iSk2RGyoKlnJPiNOZMVGmZF-V5cuF9izHOKSlmyftSfQKqYaMmO4wOqa1B0IEObjDgetUhpYOdbNjfoXXdwqEA1IPyowOPhgYZFzvO_3x9o-BGH5DdIjWGoVcBDJpgY3UH_jI5a1Tn4eovzpO3p8fXxXO6Wi9fFg-rVLNKhJQoQ0HTmkbbuDGYq5wLlePCUCEEZVTpktQMqDAFr3LKGm0MJw2pSM0VATZPbo57d274GMEH2ca3tvGkpLRkjJZlJeIUOU5pN3jvoJE7Z3vl9pJgeeApWxl5ygNPibmMPKPm_qiBaH-y4KTXFrYajHURizSD_Uf9C7lwf_I</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Walker, F.</creator><creator>Wang, J.</creator><creator>Martens, M.H.</creator><creator>Verwey, W.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles</title><author>Walker, F. ; Wang, J. ; Martens, M.H. ; Verwey, W.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1ad2ec2b25510fd05a456a407d2666232ac81b3e26d759423fcdd51f191b5a1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Automated driving</topic><topic>Automobile drivers</topic><topic>Drivers</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Electrodermal Activity</topic><topic>Eye movement behaviour</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Secondary task</topic><topic>Toll roads</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Trust calibration</topic><topic>Trust in automation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martens, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verwey, W.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, F.</au><au>Wang, J.</au><au>Martens, M.H.</au><au>Verwey, W.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>401</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>401-412</pages><issn>1369-8478</issn><eissn>1873-5517</eissn><abstract>•Gaze behaviour and EDA are reliable continuous measures of trust in automation.•Gaze behaviour and EDA, when combined, predict trust better than individually.•Automated vehicle behaviour does not need to be perfect, but predictable.•Unexpected system failures strongly and negatively impact drivers’ trust. Studies show that drivers’ intention to use automated vehicles is strongly modulated by trust. It follows that their benefits are unlikely to be achieved if users do not trust them. To date, most studies of trust in automated vehicles have relied on self-reports. However, questionnaires cannot capture real-time changes in drivers’ trust, and are hard to use in applied settings. In previous work, we found evidence that gaze behaviour could provide an effective measure of trust. In this study we tested whether combining gaze behaviour with Electrodermal Activity could provide a stronger metric. The results indicated a strong relationship between self-reported trust, monitoring behaviour and Electrodermal Activity: The higher participants’ self-reported trust, the less they monitored the road, the more attention they paid to a non-driving related secondary task, and the lower their Electrodermal Activity. We also found evidence that combined measures of gaze behaviour and Electrodermal Activity predict self-reported trust better than either of these measures on its own. These findings suggest that such combined measures have the potential to provide a reliable and objective real-time indicator of driver trust.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.021</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1369-8478
ispartof Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2019-07, Vol.64, p.401-412
issn 1369-8478
1873-5517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2283328896
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Automated driving
Automobile drivers
Drivers
Electric vehicles
Electrodermal Activity
Eye movement behaviour
Real time
Secondary task
Toll roads
Trust
Trust calibration
Trust in automation
title Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A06%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gaze%20behaviour%20and%20electrodermal%20activity:%20Objective%20measures%20of%20drivers%E2%80%99%20trust%20in%20automated%20vehicles&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20F,%20Traffic%20psychology%20and%20behaviour&rft.au=Walker,%20F.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=401-412&rft.issn=1369-8478&rft.eissn=1873-5517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283328896%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1ad2ec2b25510fd05a456a407d2666232ac81b3e26d759423fcdd51f191b5a1e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283328896&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true