Loading…

Row-crop planter performance to support variable-rate seeding of maize

Current planting technology possesses the ability to increase crop productivity and improve field efficiency by precisely metering and placing crop seeds. Planter performance depends on determining and utilizing optimal settings for different planting variables such as seed depth, down pressure, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Precision agriculture 2020-06, Vol.21 (3), p.603-619
Main Authors: Virk, S. S., Fulton, J. P., Porter, W. M., Pate, G. L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-78c97d0190f8546dfef8f192bc13b76e3563edc64842a1377ea1dc0c3f7563403
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-78c97d0190f8546dfef8f192bc13b76e3563edc64842a1377ea1dc0c3f7563403
container_end_page 619
container_issue 3
container_start_page 603
container_title Precision agriculture
container_volume 21
creator Virk, S. S.
Fulton, J. P.
Porter, W. M.
Pate, G. L.
description Current planting technology possesses the ability to increase crop productivity and improve field efficiency by precisely metering and placing crop seeds. Planter performance depends on determining and utilizing optimal settings for different planting variables such as seed depth, down pressure, and seed metering unit. The evolution of “Big Data” in agriculture today brings focus on the need for quality as-planted and yield mapping data. Therefore, an investigation was conducted to evaluate the performance of current planting technology for accurate placement of seeds while understanding the accuracy of as-planted data. Two studies consisting of two different setups on a 6-row, John Deere planter for seeding of maize ( Zea mays L.) were conducted. The first study aimed at assessing planter performance at 2 depth settings (25 and 51 mm) and four different down pressure settings (varying from none to high), while the second study focused on evaluating planter performance during variable-rate seeding with treatments consisting of two seed metering units (John Deere Standard and Precision Planting’s eSet setups) with five different seeding rates and four ground speed treatments which provided a combination of 20 different meter speeds. Field data collection consisted of measuring plant emergence, plant population and seed depth whereas plant spacing, plant population after emergence along with distance and location for rate changes within the field were also recorded for the variable-rate seeding study. Results indicated that both depth setting and downforce affected final seeding depth. Measured seed depth was significantly different from the target depth even though time was spent adjusting the units to achieve the desired prior to planting. Crop emergence did not vary significantly for the different depth and downforce settings except for target depth in Field 1. Results from the variable-rate study indicated that seeding rate changes were accomplished within a quick response time (
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11119-019-09685-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2300453629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2300453629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-78c97d0190f8546dfef8f192bc13b76e3563edc64842a1377ea1dc0c3f7563403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHP0SSzm-wepVgrFATRc0izk7Kl3azJVtFfb5YVvDkwzDDz3nw8Qq4FvxWc67skstWMj16rqmRwQmai1MCEEtVpziEXpSzVOblIacd5phVyRpYv4ZO5GHra7203YKQ9Rh_iwXYO6RBoOvZ9iAP9sLG1mz2yaAekCbFpuy0Nnh5s-42X5MzbfcKr3zgnb8uH18WKrZ8fnxb3a-ZAwcB05Wrd5Cu5r8pCNR595UUtN07ARiuEUgE2ThVVIa0ArdGKxnEHXudOwWFObqa5fQzvR0yD2YVj7PJKIyF_VIKSdUbJCZUfSymiN31sDzZ-GcHNqJeZ9DJ89FEvA5kEEyllcLfF-Df6H9YP7f9tJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300453629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Row-crop planter performance to support variable-rate seeding of maize</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Virk, S. S. ; Fulton, J. P. ; Porter, W. M. ; Pate, G. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Virk, S. S. ; Fulton, J. P. ; Porter, W. M. ; Pate, G. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Current planting technology possesses the ability to increase crop productivity and improve field efficiency by precisely metering and placing crop seeds. Planter performance depends on determining and utilizing optimal settings for different planting variables such as seed depth, down pressure, and seed metering unit. The evolution of “Big Data” in agriculture today brings focus on the need for quality as-planted and yield mapping data. Therefore, an investigation was conducted to evaluate the performance of current planting technology for accurate placement of seeds while understanding the accuracy of as-planted data. Two studies consisting of two different setups on a 6-row, John Deere planter for seeding of maize ( Zea mays L.) were conducted. The first study aimed at assessing planter performance at 2 depth settings (25 and 51 mm) and four different down pressure settings (varying from none to high), while the second study focused on evaluating planter performance during variable-rate seeding with treatments consisting of two seed metering units (John Deere Standard and Precision Planting’s eSet setups) with five different seeding rates and four ground speed treatments which provided a combination of 20 different meter speeds. Field data collection consisted of measuring plant emergence, plant population and seed depth whereas plant spacing, plant population after emergence along with distance and location for rate changes within the field were also recorded for the variable-rate seeding study. Results indicated that both depth setting and downforce affected final seeding depth. Measured seed depth was significantly different from the target depth even though time was spent adjusting the units to achieve the desired prior to planting. Crop emergence did not vary significantly for the different depth and downforce settings except for target depth in Field 1. Results from the variable-rate study indicated that seeding rate changes were accomplished within a quick response time (&lt; 1 s) at all ground speeds regardless of magnitude of rate change. Data showed that planter performance in terms of emergence and plant spacing CV was comparable for most of the meter speeds (17.4–33.5 rpm) among the two seed meters utilized in the study. Plant spacing CV increased with an increase in meter speed, however no significant differences existed among meter speeds in the range of 17.4–33.5 rpm. Results implied that correct seed metering unit setup is very critical to obtain expected performance of today’s planting technology. A concerning find was that the quality of as-applied maps from the commercial variable-rate display was not reflective of the actual planter performance in the field. The study recommended that operators need to ensure the correct planter and display setups in order to achieve needed seed placement performance to support variable-rate seeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-2256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11119-019-09685-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Computer Science ; Corn ; Crop production ; Crops ; Data collection ; Downforce ; Emergence ; Ground speed ; Life Sciences ; Mapping ; Measuring instruments ; Performance evaluation ; Physics ; Placement ; Plant populations ; Planting ; Pressure ; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry ; Response time ; Seeding ; Seeding rate ; Seeds ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Statistics for Engineering</subject><ispartof>Precision agriculture, 2020-06, Vol.21 (3), p.603-619</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-78c97d0190f8546dfef8f192bc13b76e3563edc64842a1377ea1dc0c3f7563403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-78c97d0190f8546dfef8f192bc13b76e3563edc64842a1377ea1dc0c3f7563403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2300453629/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2300453629?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,44339,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Virk, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, W. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pate, G. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Row-crop planter performance to support variable-rate seeding of maize</title><title>Precision agriculture</title><addtitle>Precision Agric</addtitle><description>Current planting technology possesses the ability to increase crop productivity and improve field efficiency by precisely metering and placing crop seeds. Planter performance depends on determining and utilizing optimal settings for different planting variables such as seed depth, down pressure, and seed metering unit. The evolution of “Big Data” in agriculture today brings focus on the need for quality as-planted and yield mapping data. Therefore, an investigation was conducted to evaluate the performance of current planting technology for accurate placement of seeds while understanding the accuracy of as-planted data. Two studies consisting of two different setups on a 6-row, John Deere planter for seeding of maize ( Zea mays L.) were conducted. The first study aimed at assessing planter performance at 2 depth settings (25 and 51 mm) and four different down pressure settings (varying from none to high), while the second study focused on evaluating planter performance during variable-rate seeding with treatments consisting of two seed metering units (John Deere Standard and Precision Planting’s eSet setups) with five different seeding rates and four ground speed treatments which provided a combination of 20 different meter speeds. Field data collection consisted of measuring plant emergence, plant population and seed depth whereas plant spacing, plant population after emergence along with distance and location for rate changes within the field were also recorded for the variable-rate seeding study. Results indicated that both depth setting and downforce affected final seeding depth. Measured seed depth was significantly different from the target depth even though time was spent adjusting the units to achieve the desired prior to planting. Crop emergence did not vary significantly for the different depth and downforce settings except for target depth in Field 1. Results from the variable-rate study indicated that seeding rate changes were accomplished within a quick response time (&lt; 1 s) at all ground speeds regardless of magnitude of rate change. Data showed that planter performance in terms of emergence and plant spacing CV was comparable for most of the meter speeds (17.4–33.5 rpm) among the two seed meters utilized in the study. Plant spacing CV increased with an increase in meter speed, however no significant differences existed among meter speeds in the range of 17.4–33.5 rpm. Results implied that correct seed metering unit setup is very critical to obtain expected performance of today’s planting technology. A concerning find was that the quality of as-applied maps from the commercial variable-rate display was not reflective of the actual planter performance in the field. The study recommended that operators need to ensure the correct planter and display setups in order to achieve needed seed placement performance to support variable-rate seeding.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Downforce</subject><subject>Emergence</subject><subject>Ground speed</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Placement</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Response time</subject><subject>Seeding</subject><subject>Seeding rate</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><issn>1385-2256</issn><issn>1573-1618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHP0SSzm-wepVgrFATRc0izk7Kl3azJVtFfb5YVvDkwzDDz3nw8Qq4FvxWc67skstWMj16rqmRwQmai1MCEEtVpziEXpSzVOblIacd5phVyRpYv4ZO5GHra7203YKQ9Rh_iwXYO6RBoOvZ9iAP9sLG1mz2yaAekCbFpuy0Nnh5s-42X5MzbfcKr3zgnb8uH18WKrZ8fnxb3a-ZAwcB05Wrd5Cu5r8pCNR595UUtN07ARiuEUgE2ThVVIa0ArdGKxnEHXudOwWFObqa5fQzvR0yD2YVj7PJKIyF_VIKSdUbJCZUfSymiN31sDzZ-GcHNqJeZ9DJ89FEvA5kEEyllcLfF-Df6H9YP7f9tJQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Virk, S. S.</creator><creator>Fulton, J. P.</creator><creator>Porter, W. M.</creator><creator>Pate, G. L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Row-crop planter performance to support variable-rate seeding of maize</title><author>Virk, S. S. ; Fulton, J. P. ; Porter, W. M. ; Pate, G. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-78c97d0190f8546dfef8f192bc13b76e3563edc64842a1377ea1dc0c3f7563403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Downforce</topic><topic>Emergence</topic><topic>Ground speed</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Placement</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Response time</topic><topic>Seeding</topic><topic>Seeding rate</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Virk, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, W. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pate, G. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Precision agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Virk, S. S.</au><au>Fulton, J. P.</au><au>Porter, W. M.</au><au>Pate, G. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Row-crop planter performance to support variable-rate seeding of maize</atitle><jtitle>Precision agriculture</jtitle><stitle>Precision Agric</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>603</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>603-619</pages><issn>1385-2256</issn><eissn>1573-1618</eissn><abstract>Current planting technology possesses the ability to increase crop productivity and improve field efficiency by precisely metering and placing crop seeds. Planter performance depends on determining and utilizing optimal settings for different planting variables such as seed depth, down pressure, and seed metering unit. The evolution of “Big Data” in agriculture today brings focus on the need for quality as-planted and yield mapping data. Therefore, an investigation was conducted to evaluate the performance of current planting technology for accurate placement of seeds while understanding the accuracy of as-planted data. Two studies consisting of two different setups on a 6-row, John Deere planter for seeding of maize ( Zea mays L.) were conducted. The first study aimed at assessing planter performance at 2 depth settings (25 and 51 mm) and four different down pressure settings (varying from none to high), while the second study focused on evaluating planter performance during variable-rate seeding with treatments consisting of two seed metering units (John Deere Standard and Precision Planting’s eSet setups) with five different seeding rates and four ground speed treatments which provided a combination of 20 different meter speeds. Field data collection consisted of measuring plant emergence, plant population and seed depth whereas plant spacing, plant population after emergence along with distance and location for rate changes within the field were also recorded for the variable-rate seeding study. Results indicated that both depth setting and downforce affected final seeding depth. Measured seed depth was significantly different from the target depth even though time was spent adjusting the units to achieve the desired prior to planting. Crop emergence did not vary significantly for the different depth and downforce settings except for target depth in Field 1. Results from the variable-rate study indicated that seeding rate changes were accomplished within a quick response time (&lt; 1 s) at all ground speeds regardless of magnitude of rate change. Data showed that planter performance in terms of emergence and plant spacing CV was comparable for most of the meter speeds (17.4–33.5 rpm) among the two seed meters utilized in the study. Plant spacing CV increased with an increase in meter speed, however no significant differences existed among meter speeds in the range of 17.4–33.5 rpm. Results implied that correct seed metering unit setup is very critical to obtain expected performance of today’s planting technology. A concerning find was that the quality of as-applied maps from the commercial variable-rate display was not reflective of the actual planter performance in the field. The study recommended that operators need to ensure the correct planter and display setups in order to achieve needed seed placement performance to support variable-rate seeding.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11119-019-09685-3</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-2256
ispartof Precision agriculture, 2020-06, Vol.21 (3), p.603-619
issn 1385-2256
1573-1618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2300453629
source ABI/INFORM global; Springer Nature
subjects Agriculture
Atmospheric Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
Computer Science
Corn
Crop production
Crops
Data collection
Downforce
Emergence
Ground speed
Life Sciences
Mapping
Measuring instruments
Performance evaluation
Physics
Placement
Plant populations
Planting
Pressure
Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry
Response time
Seeding
Seeding rate
Seeds
Soil Science & Conservation
Statistics for Engineering
title Row-crop planter performance to support variable-rate seeding of maize
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Row-crop%20planter%20performance%20to%20support%20variable-rate%20seeding%20of%20maize&rft.jtitle=Precision%20agriculture&rft.au=Virk,%20S.%20S.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=603&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=603-619&rft.issn=1385-2256&rft.eissn=1573-1618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11119-019-09685-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2300453629%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-78c97d0190f8546dfef8f192bc13b76e3563edc64842a1377ea1dc0c3f7563403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300453629&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true