Identification of the Major Sources Contributing to PM2.5 Observed in Toronto

• Published in: Environmental science & technology 2003-11, Vol.37 (21), p.4831-4840
• Main Authors: Lee, Patrick K. H, Brook, Jeffrey R, Dabek-Zlotorzynska, Ewa, Mabury, Scott A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aerosols; Air Pollutants - analysis; Air pollution; Applied sciences; Atmospheric pollution; Chemicals; Cities; Coal; Emissions; Environmental Monitoring; Exact sciences and technology; Incineration; Ontario; Organic Chemicals - analysis; Particle Size; Pollution; Pollution sources. Measurement results; Seasons; Vehicle Emissions - analysis
• ISSN: 0013-936X; 1520-5851
• DOI: 10.1021/es026473i

The chemical composition of Toronto PM2.5 was measured daily from Feb 2000 to Feb 2001, and source apportionment was undertaken using positive matrix factorization (PMF). In Toronto, PM2.5 levels were influenced both by local urban activities and also by regional-scale transport. Although several PMF solutions were possible, an eight-source model for explaining the observed Toronto PM2.5 was found to provide realistic results and interesting insights into sources. The four main sources were coal combustion related to regional transport and secondary sulfate (26%), secondary nitrate related to both local and upwind sources of NO x and NH3 (36%), secondary organic aerosols (SOA) formed from a variety of precursor organic emissions (15%), and motor vehicle traffic (10%). The other detectable sources were road salt (winter) and three types of primary PM2.5 hypothesized to be associated with smelters, coal and oil combustion, industry, and local construction. Overall, motor vehicle-related emissions (including road salt and nitrate) were estimated to be responsible for about 40% of the PM2.5. In the summer, the SOA mass was estimated to contribute ∼20% to the PM2.5. Inclusion of water-soluble, low-molecular-weight organic acids led to identification of this component, thus providing a significant improvement in PMF's ability to resolve sources. Without organic acid measurements the SOA portion of the observed PM2.5 was assigned to the secondary coal component, increasing its contribution and resulting in a source profile with an unrealistic amount of organic mass. This suggests that in the northeastern part of North America, there are physical and/or chemical processes that lead to close interaction between secondary organic and inorganic aerosols.