A reappraisal of the phylogeny of Mylodontidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) and the divergence of mylodontine and lestodontine sloths

The phylogeny of mylodontid sloths has recently been the subject of multiple studies. Contrasting hypotheses have been proposed, especially for the relationships among late Miocene–Pleistocene mylodontines and lestodontines. In this paper, a new and detailed phylogenetic analysis is conducted, after...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zoologica scripta 2019-11, Vol.48 (6), p.691-710
Main Authors: Boscaini, Alberto, Pujos, François, Gaudin, Timothy J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
anatomy
Divergence
Folivora
Miocene
morphology
Mylodontidae
New taxa
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Pleistocene
Skeleton
sloths
Taxa
Taxonomy
Tropical climate
Xenarthra
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The phylogeny of mylodontid sloths has recently been the subject of multiple studies. Contrasting hypotheses have been proposed, especially for the relationships among late Miocene–Pleistocene mylodontines and lestodontines. In this paper, a new and detailed phylogenetic analysis is conducted, after adding new characters and taxa previously unexplored from a phylogenetic point of view. New features derived from postcranial skeletal anatomy are added to previous studies based on craniodental evidence. In this way, the current reappraisal represents the first exhaustive phylogenetic study on the Mylodontidae that incorporates features coded for the entire skeleton. When available, multiple specimens of each bony element are observed for each operational taxonomic unit, in order to take into account intraspecific variation. The taxonomic sample of this study considers Mylodontinae at the specific level. However, many other Mylodontidae are considered, and their phylogenetic relationships tested. The taxonomic sample of this study is enriched with new taxa from central and northern South America, with the aim of compensating for the knowledge bias in favour of austral mylodontids, which have historically been more extensively studied than those from tropical latitudes. Special emphasis is given to the phylogenetic relationships of Mylodontinae, and particularly to the mylodontine and lestodontine sloths, that are recovered in the present study as monophyletic clades, and together form a larger monophyletic group. According to the present results, the Mylodontini–Lestodontini split occurred at the middle–late Miocene transition, giving rise to independent adaptive radiations across South and North America.
ISSN:0300-3256
1463-6409
DOI:10.1111/zsc.12376