Loading…
Optimizing ventilation: Theoretical study on increasing rates in offices to maximize occupant productivity with constrained additional energy use
Ventilation affects building energy use and indoor air quality, with minimum rates prescribed by standards. However, research has demonstrated positive outcomes associated with increasing ventilation, including occupant productivity from increased work performance and reduced absenteeism. Herein, a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Building and environment 2019-12, Vol.166, p.106314, Article 106314 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-701e9974a3d895416518011883b5ad2223dec8283654031c914d2ae13ebac4933 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-701e9974a3d895416518011883b5ad2223dec8283654031c914d2ae13ebac4933 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106314 |
container_title | Building and environment |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | Ben-David, Tom Rackes, Adams Lo, L. James Wen, Jin Waring, Michael S. |
description | Ventilation affects building energy use and indoor air quality, with minimum rates prescribed by standards. However, research has demonstrated positive outcomes associated with increasing ventilation, including occupant productivity from increased work performance and reduced absenteeism. Herein, a novel ventilation strategy was proposed and simulated for offices, which optimized day-averaged ventilation rates over an annual time horizon to provide maximal amounts of outdoor air and so maximize occupant productive work hours, within varying energy use constraints. Energy use and productivity were often influenced by ventilation oppositely, so results were Pareto optimal. This optimization methodology was simulated in three locations for an average- and high-performance small office building, considering users with varying levels of confidence in ventilation-productivity relationships. To contextualize potential optimization impacts, four annual energy budgets were first determined for a typical year at constant ventilation rates of 8.5, 10, 20, and 30 L/s/occupant, and then for those four cases, day-averaged ventilation rates were optimized over annual trajectories considering the constrained energy budgets. Among all simulated cases, lost productive hours due to lower ventilation at constant rates were halved when using the optimized higher annual rates, with a gain of ~20 h/year per occupant on average, amounting to approximately $48/m2 at standard occupant density and mean wage. Offline optimization results were used to develop heuristic rules to predict a ventilation rate for any single day based on weather forecast that would adhere to a building- and climate-specific Pareto optimization, opening avenues for future control strategies that use this framework in real buildings.
•Increases in office-worker productive hours are associated with increasing ventilation.•Ventilation was optimized to increase productivity under various energy constraints.•Ventilation could vary each day of the year to maximize total outdoor air delivered.•Simulations perturbed variables of energy budgets, locations, building types, and user profiles.•On average, optimized ventilation rates reduced lost productive hours by one-half. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106314 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2316776428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132319305244</els_id><sourcerecordid>2316776428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-701e9974a3d895416518011883b5ad2223dec8283654031c914d2ae13ebac4933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUM1qGzEQFqGFuG5foQhyXkezkrW7OaWEJg0EckmhNyFL42SMLTmS1q37Fn3janFz7mmG4fubj7HPIBYgQF9uFquRth7DYdEKGOpRS1BnbAZ9Jxvdqx_v2ExILRqQrTxnH3LeiEocpJqxP4_7Qjv6TeGZHzAU2tpCMVzxpxeMCQs5u-W5jP7IY-AUXEKbJ3CyBXM98Lhek6triXxnf01ayKNz496Gwvcp-tEVOlA58p9UXriLIZdkKaDn1nua3KoFBkzPRz5m_Mjer-0246d_c86-3359uvnWPDze3d98eWicUro0nQAchk5Z6fthqUAvoRcAfS9XS-vbtpUeXd_2Ui-VkOAGUL61CBJX1qlByjm7OOnWjK8j5mI2cUw1SzatBN11WlX2nOkTyqWYc8K12Sfa2XQ0IMxUv9mYt_rNVL851V-J1yci1h8OhMlkRxgcekroivGR_ifxF9A7lNs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316776428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing ventilation: Theoretical study on increasing rates in offices to maximize occupant productivity with constrained additional energy use</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Ben-David, Tom ; Rackes, Adams ; Lo, L. James ; Wen, Jin ; Waring, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ben-David, Tom ; Rackes, Adams ; Lo, L. James ; Wen, Jin ; Waring, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>Ventilation affects building energy use and indoor air quality, with minimum rates prescribed by standards. However, research has demonstrated positive outcomes associated with increasing ventilation, including occupant productivity from increased work performance and reduced absenteeism. Herein, a novel ventilation strategy was proposed and simulated for offices, which optimized day-averaged ventilation rates over an annual time horizon to provide maximal amounts of outdoor air and so maximize occupant productive work hours, within varying energy use constraints. Energy use and productivity were often influenced by ventilation oppositely, so results were Pareto optimal. This optimization methodology was simulated in three locations for an average- and high-performance small office building, considering users with varying levels of confidence in ventilation-productivity relationships. To contextualize potential optimization impacts, four annual energy budgets were first determined for a typical year at constant ventilation rates of 8.5, 10, 20, and 30 L/s/occupant, and then for those four cases, day-averaged ventilation rates were optimized over annual trajectories considering the constrained energy budgets. Among all simulated cases, lost productive hours due to lower ventilation at constant rates were halved when using the optimized higher annual rates, with a gain of ~20 h/year per occupant on average, amounting to approximately $48/m2 at standard occupant density and mean wage. Offline optimization results were used to develop heuristic rules to predict a ventilation rate for any single day based on weather forecast that would adhere to a building- and climate-specific Pareto optimization, opening avenues for future control strategies that use this framework in real buildings.
•Increases in office-worker productive hours are associated with increasing ventilation.•Ventilation was optimized to increase productivity under various energy constraints.•Ventilation could vary each day of the year to maximize total outdoor air delivered.•Simulations perturbed variables of energy budgets, locations, building types, and user profiles.•On average, optimized ventilation rates reduced lost productive hours by one-half.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Air quality ; Air quality standards ; Building energy ; Buildings ; Constraints ; Energy ; Energy budget ; Energy consumption ; Healthy buildings ; Indoor air pollution ; Indoor air quality ; Indoor environments ; Occupant performance ; Office buildings ; Optimization ; Pareto optimization ; Productivity ; Simulation ; Trajectory optimization ; Ventilation ; Ventilation control ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2019-12, Vol.166, p.106314, Article 106314</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-701e9974a3d895416518011883b5ad2223dec8283654031c914d2ae13ebac4933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-701e9974a3d895416518011883b5ad2223dec8283654031c914d2ae13ebac4933</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1864-9268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ben-David, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rackes, Adams</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, L. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waring, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing ventilation: Theoretical study on increasing rates in offices to maximize occupant productivity with constrained additional energy use</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Ventilation affects building energy use and indoor air quality, with minimum rates prescribed by standards. However, research has demonstrated positive outcomes associated with increasing ventilation, including occupant productivity from increased work performance and reduced absenteeism. Herein, a novel ventilation strategy was proposed and simulated for offices, which optimized day-averaged ventilation rates over an annual time horizon to provide maximal amounts of outdoor air and so maximize occupant productive work hours, within varying energy use constraints. Energy use and productivity were often influenced by ventilation oppositely, so results were Pareto optimal. This optimization methodology was simulated in three locations for an average- and high-performance small office building, considering users with varying levels of confidence in ventilation-productivity relationships. To contextualize potential optimization impacts, four annual energy budgets were first determined for a typical year at constant ventilation rates of 8.5, 10, 20, and 30 L/s/occupant, and then for those four cases, day-averaged ventilation rates were optimized over annual trajectories considering the constrained energy budgets. Among all simulated cases, lost productive hours due to lower ventilation at constant rates were halved when using the optimized higher annual rates, with a gain of ~20 h/year per occupant on average, amounting to approximately $48/m2 at standard occupant density and mean wage. Offline optimization results were used to develop heuristic rules to predict a ventilation rate for any single day based on weather forecast that would adhere to a building- and climate-specific Pareto optimization, opening avenues for future control strategies that use this framework in real buildings.
•Increases in office-worker productive hours are associated with increasing ventilation.•Ventilation was optimized to increase productivity under various energy constraints.•Ventilation could vary each day of the year to maximize total outdoor air delivered.•Simulations perturbed variables of energy budgets, locations, building types, and user profiles.•On average, optimized ventilation rates reduced lost productive hours by one-half.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Air quality standards</subject><subject>Building energy</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy budget</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Healthy buildings</subject><subject>Indoor air pollution</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Occupant performance</subject><subject>Office buildings</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Trajectory optimization</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilation control</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUM1qGzEQFqGFuG5foQhyXkezkrW7OaWEJg0EckmhNyFL42SMLTmS1q37Fn3janFz7mmG4fubj7HPIBYgQF9uFquRth7DYdEKGOpRS1BnbAZ9Jxvdqx_v2ExILRqQrTxnH3LeiEocpJqxP4_7Qjv6TeGZHzAU2tpCMVzxpxeMCQs5u-W5jP7IY-AUXEKbJ3CyBXM98Lhek6triXxnf01ayKNz496Gwvcp-tEVOlA58p9UXriLIZdkKaDn1nua3KoFBkzPRz5m_Mjer-0246d_c86-3359uvnWPDze3d98eWicUro0nQAchk5Z6fthqUAvoRcAfS9XS-vbtpUeXd_2Ui-VkOAGUL61CBJX1qlByjm7OOnWjK8j5mI2cUw1SzatBN11WlX2nOkTyqWYc8K12Sfa2XQ0IMxUv9mYt_rNVL851V-J1yci1h8OhMlkRxgcekroivGR_ifxF9A7lNs</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Ben-David, Tom</creator><creator>Rackes, Adams</creator><creator>Lo, L. James</creator><creator>Wen, Jin</creator><creator>Waring, Michael S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1864-9268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Optimizing ventilation: Theoretical study on increasing rates in offices to maximize occupant productivity with constrained additional energy use</title><author>Ben-David, Tom ; Rackes, Adams ; Lo, L. James ; Wen, Jin ; Waring, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-701e9974a3d895416518011883b5ad2223dec8283654031c914d2ae13ebac4933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Air quality standards</topic><topic>Building energy</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy budget</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Healthy buildings</topic><topic>Indoor air pollution</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Occupant performance</topic><topic>Office buildings</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Trajectory optimization</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilation control</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ben-David, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rackes, Adams</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, L. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waring, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ben-David, Tom</au><au>Rackes, Adams</au><au>Lo, L. James</au><au>Wen, Jin</au><au>Waring, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing ventilation: Theoretical study on increasing rates in offices to maximize occupant productivity with constrained additional energy use</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>166</volume><spage>106314</spage><pages>106314-</pages><artnum>106314</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Ventilation affects building energy use and indoor air quality, with minimum rates prescribed by standards. However, research has demonstrated positive outcomes associated with increasing ventilation, including occupant productivity from increased work performance and reduced absenteeism. Herein, a novel ventilation strategy was proposed and simulated for offices, which optimized day-averaged ventilation rates over an annual time horizon to provide maximal amounts of outdoor air and so maximize occupant productive work hours, within varying energy use constraints. Energy use and productivity were often influenced by ventilation oppositely, so results were Pareto optimal. This optimization methodology was simulated in three locations for an average- and high-performance small office building, considering users with varying levels of confidence in ventilation-productivity relationships. To contextualize potential optimization impacts, four annual energy budgets were first determined for a typical year at constant ventilation rates of 8.5, 10, 20, and 30 L/s/occupant, and then for those four cases, day-averaged ventilation rates were optimized over annual trajectories considering the constrained energy budgets. Among all simulated cases, lost productive hours due to lower ventilation at constant rates were halved when using the optimized higher annual rates, with a gain of ~20 h/year per occupant on average, amounting to approximately $48/m2 at standard occupant density and mean wage. Offline optimization results were used to develop heuristic rules to predict a ventilation rate for any single day based on weather forecast that would adhere to a building- and climate-specific Pareto optimization, opening avenues for future control strategies that use this framework in real buildings.
•Increases in office-worker productive hours are associated with increasing ventilation.•Ventilation was optimized to increase productivity under various energy constraints.•Ventilation could vary each day of the year to maximize total outdoor air delivered.•Simulations perturbed variables of energy budgets, locations, building types, and user profiles.•On average, optimized ventilation rates reduced lost productive hours by one-half.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106314</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1864-9268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-1323 |
ispartof | Building and environment, 2019-12, Vol.166, p.106314, Article 106314 |
issn | 0360-1323 1873-684X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2316776428 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Absenteeism Air quality Air quality standards Building energy Buildings Constraints Energy Energy budget Energy consumption Healthy buildings Indoor air pollution Indoor air quality Indoor environments Occupant performance Office buildings Optimization Pareto optimization Productivity Simulation Trajectory optimization Ventilation Ventilation control Weather forecasting |
title | Optimizing ventilation: Theoretical study on increasing rates in offices to maximize occupant productivity with constrained additional energy use |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A30%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20ventilation:%20Theoretical%20study%20on%20increasing%20rates%20in%20offices%20to%20maximize%20occupant%20productivity%20with%20constrained%20additional%20energy%20use&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Ben-David,%20Tom&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=166&rft.spage=106314&rft.pages=106314-&rft.artnum=106314&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106314&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2316776428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-701e9974a3d895416518011883b5ad2223dec8283654031c914d2ae13ebac4933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316776428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |