EMPIRICAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEMS WITH CUSTODY RECOMMENDATIONS: A Call for Clinical Humility and Judicial Vigilance

This article proposes a four‐level model of clinical inferences to analyze the psychological evaluation process in custody matters. At each level the authors summarize the status of the relevant psychological literature and conclude that, as clinicians respond to the ultimate issues (e.g., who shoul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Family court review 2005-04, Vol.43 (2), p.193-222
Main Authors: Tippins, Timothy M., Wittmann, Jeffrey P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Child custody
Ethics
Psychology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article proposes a four‐level model of clinical inferences to analyze the psychological evaluation process in custody matters. At each level the authors summarize the status of the relevant psychological literature and conclude that, as clinicians respond to the ultimate issues (e.g., who should be the custodial parent) the empirical foundation for such conclusions is tenuous or non‐existent. A jurisprudence argument is also made that such opinions should be routinely excluded from the fact‐finding process. Given the significant potential for specific custody recommendations to limit personal liberties and the trajectory of a child's life, the paucity of relevant research available in this area, and profound evidentiary issues, such recommendations should be viewed as ethically inappropriate. A model for what clinicians can ethically say to courts is proposed.
ISSN:1531-2445
1744-1617
DOI:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00019.x