Life cycle assessment to quantify the impact of technology improvements in bike‐sharing systems

• Published in: Journal of industrial ecology 2020-02, Vol.24 (1), p.138-148
• Main Authors: Bonilla‐Alicea, Ricardo Javier, Watson, Bryan C., Shen, Ziheng, Tamayo, Laura, Telenko, Cassandra
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bicycles; Docks; Ecosystems; electrical and electronic equipment (EEE); Emissions; Empirical analysis; Environmental impact; Greenhouse effect; Greenhouse gases; Life cycle analysis; Life cycle assessment; life cycle assessment (LCA); Life cycles; Popularity; Population density; product service systems (PSS); Residential density; smart bike sharing; technological change and innovation; Technology; transportation
• ISSN: 1088-1980; 1530-9290
• DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12860

The reduced environmental footprint of bicycle sharing systems (BSS) is one of the reasons for their rapid growth in popularity. BSS have evolved technologically, transitioning from smart dock systems to smart bicycle systems, and it is not clear if the increased use of electronics in BSS results in a net environmental benefit. This article provides an evaluation of the impact of incorporating additional technology into BSS and uses that analysis as guidance for future BSS development. By comparing the impacts of a private bicycle, a smart dock BSS, and smart bike BSS using a life cycle assessment (LCA), this work reveals breakeven points and tradeoffs between the technologies. This study is also the first published empirical LCA of a smart bike known to the authors. In the production phase, smart bikes generate approximately three times the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the smart dock bikes per kilometer ridden over the lifetime, and when considering the endpoint categories of human health, ecosystem, and resources, smart bikes have approximately 2.7 times the environmental impact. The results suggest that shifting from smart dock to smart bike requires an increase in ridership by a factor of 1.8 to overcome the increased environmental impact based on the GHG emissions. We find that smart docks become preferable at a population density between 1,030 residents/km2 (in a bike friendly city) and 3,100 residents/km2 (in a city that is less likely to bike).