Loading…
Bevacizumab versus alkylating chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma
Background The use of alkylating chemotherapy versus bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma remains controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the activity of alkylators, but not that of bevacizumab, would be associated with the O 6 - methylguanine DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) promoter met...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2020-03, Vol.146 (3), p.659-670 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The use of alkylating chemotherapy versus bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma remains controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the activity of alkylators, but not that of bevacizumab, would be associated with the
O
6
-
methylguanine DNA methyltransferase
(
MGMT
) promoter methylation status.
Methods
We analyzed a cohort of patients treated at centers of the German Glioma Network or the University Hospital Zurich with alkylating agent-based chemotherapy (
n
= 260) or bevacizumab without or with irinotecan (
n
= 84) for first recurrence of glioblastoma. Outcome was stratified for
O
6
-
methylguanine DNA methyltransferase
(
MGMT
) status and crossover to bevacizumab or alkylators at further progression.
Results
Median post-recurrence survival-1 (PRS-1) for patients receiving alkylating agents at first recurrence was longer than with bevacizumab (11.1 versus 7.4 months,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0171-5216 1432-1335 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00432-019-03086-9 |