Loading…

Bevacizumab versus alkylating chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma

Background The use of alkylating chemotherapy versus bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma remains controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the activity of alkylators, but not that of bevacizumab, would be associated with the O 6 - methylguanine DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) promoter met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2020-03, Vol.146 (3), p.659-670
Main Authors: Seystahl, Katharina, Hentschel, Bettina, Loew, Sarah, Gramatzki, Dorothee, Felsberg, Jörg, Herrlinger, Ulrich, Westphal, Manfred, Schackert, Gabriele, Thon, Niklas, Tatagiba, Marcos, Pietsch, Torsten, Reifenberger, Guido, Löffler, Markus, Wick, Wolfgang, Weller, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The use of alkylating chemotherapy versus bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma remains controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the activity of alkylators, but not that of bevacizumab, would be associated with the O 6 - methylguanine DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) promoter methylation status. Methods We analyzed a cohort of patients treated at centers of the German Glioma Network or the University Hospital Zurich with alkylating agent-based chemotherapy ( n  = 260) or bevacizumab without or with irinotecan ( n  = 84) for first recurrence of glioblastoma. Outcome was stratified for O 6 - methylguanine DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) status and crossover to bevacizumab or alkylators at further progression. Results Median post-recurrence survival-1 (PRS-1) for patients receiving alkylating agents at first recurrence was longer than with bevacizumab (11.1 versus 7.4 months, p  
ISSN:0171-5216
1432-1335
DOI:10.1007/s00432-019-03086-9