Default and Migration Rates for Private Equity-Sponsored Issuers

This study examines historical default, credit loss and migration rates for North American speculative-grade non-financial issuers owned by private equity sponsors. We find that in the three years after being acquired by a private equity sponsor, speculative-grade sponsored issuers experience roughl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of private equity 2007-04, Vol.10 (2), p.38-46
Main Authors: Emery, Kenneth, Cantor, Richard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cohort effect
Control systems
Corporate sponsorship
Credit
Credit ratings
Credit risk
Default
Equity
Financial management
Industry
LBO
Leveraged buyouts
Loan defaults
Private equity
Ratings & rankings
Ratios
Statistical significance
Studies
Trade shows
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examines historical default, credit loss and migration rates for North American speculative-grade non-financial issuers owned by private equity sponsors. We find that in the three years after being acquired by a private equity sponsor, speculative-grade sponsored issuers experience roughly 60% higher default rates than other speculativegrade non-sponsored issuers; and they experience downgrade-to-upgrade ratios almost double what they are for non-sponsored issuers around the time of the acquisition. Additionally, the impact of sponsorship on creditworthiness varies considerably across firms. In particular, while the credit performance of firms that were relatively strong at the time of the acquisition (e.g., rated Ba) tends to deteriorate after they are acquired, the default rates and downgrade rates of firms that were already in distress (e.g., those rated Caa or below) are lower after the acquisition than those of similarly rated non-sponsored issuers, suggesting a potential white-knight role for private equity sponsors. We also find that Moody's has on average adjusted ratings appropriately after private equity takeovers. Specifically, we find that default rates by rating category for sponsored issuers and non-sponsored issuers are roughly similar.
ISSN:1096-5572
2168-8508
DOI:10.3905/jpe.2007.682344