Loading…
Early development of Monoplex pilearis and Monoplex parthenopeus (Gastropoda: Cymatiidae): biology and morphology
Members of family Cymatiidae have an unusually long planktonic larval life stage (veligers) which allows them to be carried within ocean currents and become distributed worldwide. However, little is known about these planktonic veligers and identification of the larval state of many Cymatiidae is ch...
Saved in:
Published in: | Organisms diversity & evolution 2020-03, Vol.20 (1), p.51-62 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Members of family Cymatiidae have an unusually long planktonic larval life stage (veligers) which allows them to be carried within ocean currents and become distributed worldwide. However, little is known about these planktonic veligers and identification of the larval state of many Cymatiidae is challenging at best. Here, we describe the first high-quality scanning electron microscopy images of the developing veliger larvae of
Monoplex pilearis
and
Monoplex parthenopeus
(Gastropoda: Cymatiidae). The developing shell of
Monoplex
veligers was captured by SEM, showing plates secreted to form the completed shell. The incubation time of the two species was recorded and found to be different;
M. parthenopeus
took 24Â days to develop fully and hatch out of the egg capsules, whereas
M. pilearis
took over a month to leave the egg capsule. Using scanning electron microscopy and geometric morphometrics, the morphology of veliger larvae was compared. No significant differences were found between the shapes of the developing shell between the two species; however, it was found that
M. pilearis
was significantly larger than
M. parthenopeus
upon hatching. Although statistical analysis did not find morphological differences, this study concludes biological differences do exist between these two closely related species of
Monoplex
. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1439-6092 1618-1077 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13127-020-00432-5 |