But What Does It Mean? Competition between Products Carrying Alternative Green Labels When Consumers Are Active Acquirers of Information

Programs that certify the environmental (or other social) attributes of firms are common. But the proliferation of labeling schemes makes it difficult for consumers to know what each one means—what level of “greenness” does a particular label imply? We provide the first model in which consumers can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 2020-03, Vol.7 (2), p.243-277
Main Authors: Heyes, Anthony, Kapur, Sandeep, Kennedy, Peter W., Martin, Steve, Maxwell, John W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Consumers
Data processing
Environmental impact
Environmental information
Labels
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Programs that certify the environmental (or other social) attributes of firms are common. But the proliferation of labeling schemes makes it difficult for consumers to know what each one means—what level of “greenness” does a particular label imply? We provide the first model in which consumers can expend effort to learn what labels mean. The relationship between information acquisition costs, firm pricing decisions, the market shares obtained by alternatively labeled goods and a brown “backstop” good, and total environmental impact proves complex. Consumer informedness can have perverse implications. In plausible cases a reduction in the cost of information damages environmental outcomes. Our results challenge the presumption that provision of environmental information to the public is necessarily good for welfare or the environment.
ISSN:2333-5955
2333-5963
DOI:10.1086/706548