Zirconium stable isotope analysis of zircon by MC-ICP-MS: methods and application to evaluating intra-crystalline zonation in a zircon megacryst

• Published in: Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.1167-1186
• Main Authors: Tompkins, Hannah G. D, Zieman, Lisa J, Ibañez-Mejia, Mauricio, Tissot, François L. H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Crystallization; Fractionation; High temperature; Homogeneity; Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; Isotope composition; Isotopes; Magma; Mass spectrometry; Mathematical analysis; Reproducibility; Terrestrial environments; Uncertainty analysis; Zircon; Zirconium dioxide; Zirconium isotopes; Zirconium silicate
• ISSN: 0267-9477; 1364-5544
• DOI: 10.1039/c9ja00315k

Zirconium (Zr) plays a key role in the development of phases like zircon (ZrSiO 4 ) and baddeleyite (ZrO 2 ) in magmatic systems. These minerals are crucial for the study of geologic time and crustal evolution, and their high resistivity to weathering and erosion results in their preservation on timescales of billions of years. Although zircon and baddeleyite may also preserve a robust record of Zr isotope behavior in high-temperature terrestrial environments, little is known about the factors that control Zr isotope partitioning in magmatic systems, the petrogenetic significance of fractionated compositions, or how these variations are recorded in Zr-rich accessory phases. Here, we describe a new analytical protocol for accurately determining the Zr stable isotope composition of zircon by multicollector-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS), using the double-spike method to correct for procedural and instrumental mass bias. We apply this technique to test whether zircon crystallization in carbonatite magmatic systems is a driver of Zr isotope fractionation by interrogating the internal zonation of a zircon megacryst from the Mud Tank carbonatite (MTUR1). We find the MTUR1 megacryst to lack internal zoning within analytical uncertainties with a mean μ 94/90 Zr NIST = −55 ± 28 ppm (2 SD, n = 151), which suggests that zircon crystallization is not a driver of Zr isotope fractionation in carbonatite magmas. This observation is in stark contrast with those made in silicate magmatic systems, raising the possibility that the bonding environment of Zr 4+ ions may be fundamentally different in carbonatite vs. silicate melts. Because of its remarkable homogeneity, the MTUR1 megacryst is an ideal natural reference material for Zr isotopic analysis of zircon using both solution and spatially resolved methods. The reproducibility of a pure Zr solution and our chemically purified zircon fractions indicate that the external reproducibility of our method is on the order of ±28 ppm for μ 94/90 Zr, or ±7 ppm per amu, at 95% confidence. An analytical protocol for Zr stable isotope analysis using a double-spike is described and applied to understanding mass-dependent isotopic fractionation in carbonatitic magmatic systems driven by zircon crystallization.