'Kim Davis be like  ... ': a feminist critique of gender humor in online political memes

In this era of participatory and social media, memes have become a user-generated form of political discussion. The online conversation surrounding Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis who was jailed for refusing to issue gay marriage licenses provides insight into the rhetoric used in political memes. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Information, communication & society communication & society, 2020-06, Vol.23 (7), p.1057-1073
Main Authors: Harlow, Summer, Rowlett, Jerrica Ty, Huse, Laura-Kate
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Civil rights
Digital media
Feminism
Feminist theory
Gender
Hegemony
Homosexuality
Humor
Internet
LGBTQ rights
LGBTQ rights movements
Marginality
Mass media
memes
Personal appearance
political discussion
Politics
Public sphere
Qualitative analysis
Quantitative analysis
Race
Rhetoric
Same sex marriage
Social media
User generated content
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this era of participatory and social media, memes have become a user-generated form of political discussion. The online conversation surrounding Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis who was jailed for refusing to issue gay marriage licenses provides insight into the rhetoric used in political memes. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis using a lens of feminist humor theory, this study of Davis-related memes suggests that users trying to battle anti-gay ideologies resorted to anti-feminist rhetoric by targeting her physical appearance as a woman and using traditional 'slut humor.' Additionally, civil rights comparisons illustrate a misconstrued understanding of race and hegemony. Thus, far from serving as an alternative public sphere for marginalized voices, we conclude Internet memes are maintaining the status quo, furthering gendered political and communications systems and virtually ignoring the underlying gay rights issue.
ISSN:1369-118X
1468-4462
DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1550524